[DISCUSS] Release imaging in its current state? (or release it never...)

2015-05-11 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, over the past few month I've been working on [imaging]. Looking through the list of FindBugs and Checkstyle issues, I wonder what we should do with imaging. The code doesn't meet our quality requirements, yet people seem to be using imaging. I wonder if we should simply release [imaging] in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release imaging in its current state? (or release it never...)

2015-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
I think we should release it indeed but as what is the question: an alpha, beta or 1.0. I'm not fully able to dig in though, I am OOT on a biz trip and recovering from a cold to boot. Would you mind digging through the email archives? I _know_ we've discussed this in the past and there is a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release imaging in its current state? (or release it never...)

2015-05-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/11/15 11:27 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi, over the past few month I've been working on [imaging]. Looking through the list of FindBugs and Checkstyle issues, I wonder what we should do with imaging. The code doesn't meet our quality requirements, yet people seem to be using imaging.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release imaging in its current state? (or release it never...)

2015-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/11/15 11:27 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi, over the past few month I've been working on [imaging]. Looking through the list of FindBugs and Checkstyle issues, I wonder what we should do with imaging. The