Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, I’m very happy to see to much positive feedback on this idea! Let’s wait a little longer to give others a chance to chime in. We can then discuss the details (e.g. which build tool to use) Regards, Benedikt > Am 12.02.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Dave Brosius : > > +1 to

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Dave Brosius
+1 to adding scala (or other) language support. I'd just rather stay away from mixing languages in projects. On 02/12/2017 03:36 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: As we already host some C-code in Commons, I see no reason to reject Scala or other JVM languages. I have done some experiments with Scala

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Matt Sicker
We're using Maven in Log4j 2 for our Scala API and it seems to work fine, but it's not exactly a large submodule (just a few classes). This is the plugin we're using: . As for using SBT, I have one friend who loves it, and I have a couple other friends

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Oliver Heger
As we already host some C-code in Commons, I see no reason to reject Scala or other JVM languages. I have done some experiments with Scala myself and am very impressed by this language. I might even have a small library which could become a component. One question: Which build tool would we use?

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
t <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2017 4:52 AM Subject: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons Hello, Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly shifting from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for ways to contri

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-02-12, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ > libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly > shifting from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for ways to contribute > to Open Source with Scala. For this reason I’d

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello, > > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ libraries. It's seemed slightly odd to me that there weren't more supported languages represented in Commons. Scala seems like a

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm all for it. Gary On Feb 12, 2017 7:53 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hello, > > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ > libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly shifting > from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for

[DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly shifting from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for ways to contribute to Open Source with Scala. For this reason I’d like to discuss whether Commons