Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

On Jun 25, 2017 5:54 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: Hi, > Am 24.06.2017 um 20:19 schrieb Matt Benson : > > TBH, I don't know that I think there's a reason to do such a library unless it's really a game changer. Currently functor is somehow in limbo

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

be interesting to have something there, unless it made more >>>>> sense to put it on lang. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The reason for the API module, if memory serves me well, was to provide >>> a >>>>> pre Jav

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

Java 8 that used Lambdas > >> > >> Though right now, with Java 9 around the corner, a single module, > trying to > >> provide useful code that doesn't fit in lang would be better IMHO. > >> > >> Hope that helps. > >> > >> Thanks >

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

useful code that doesn't fit in lang would be better IMHO. > > Hope that helps. > > Thanks > Bruno > > From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, 16 June 2017 9:04 PM > Su

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

would be better IMHO. Hope that helps. Thanks Bruno From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Friday, 16 June 2017 9:04 PM Subject: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module? Hi, I’m ab

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

be better IMHO. Hope that helps. Thanks Bruno From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Friday, 16 June 2017 9:04 PM Subject: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module? Hi, I’m about to start wor

[FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

Hi, I’m about to start work on functor. Looking at the project, I wonder why we have a separation bewteen an API module and implementations. This feels like overkill to me for a project like functor. Further more I don’t see other parties extending the stuff in the API module. If nobody