I've created GEOMETRY-138 [1] to track this and discuss the technical details.
-Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEOMETRY/issues/GEOMETRY-138
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le sam. 24 juil. 2021 à 18:25, Matt Juntunen
> a écrit :
> >
> > I don't
Le sam. 24 juil. 2021 à 18:25, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> I don't have a preference for checked or unchecked exceptions. I just
> want it to be consistent, easy to use, and maintainable.
Checked exceptions are a maintenance nightmare.
[Some time in the future, you change the implementation so
Note that the JRE provides UncheckedIOException.
Gary
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 12:25 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> I don't have a preference for checked or unchecked exceptions. I just
> want it to be consistent, easy to use, and maintainable. With that
> said, what specific changes are you picturing
I don't have a preference for checked or unchecked exceptions. I just
want it to be consistent, easy to use, and maintainable. With that
said, what specific changes are you picturing should be made to the
code here? Are you suggesting a geometry-specific exception type?
Should we wrap IOExceptions
Hi.
Le sam. 24 juil. 2021 à 17:01, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > AFAICT, a precondition (max string length) is violated by the input: the
> error is the caller's fault (either passing a too long string, or not having
> set an appropriate upper bound).
>
> This is not correct. This
Hello,
> AFAICT, a precondition (max string length) is violated by the input: the
error is the caller's fault (either passing a too long string, or not having
set an appropriate upper bound).
This is not correct. This exception is thrown when a string token from
the input stream exceeds the
Hello.
Somehow I missed that [Geometry] contains usage of checked exceptions.
As mentioned in other threads, I have a hard time conceiving that the kind
of codes we are dealing with here ever needs the concept of checked
exception (in its intended usage per the _current_ Java experts, and not
