On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
hm, the problem may be, that the scm section of the poms in the pre-git
releases point to the svn location.
If so, then the project hasn't really migrated to git, has it?
Jochen
--
Any world that can produce the Taj
...@materne.de
To: 'Commons Developers List' dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 10:37 PM
Subject: AW: [Git] drop SVN repos for components using Git?
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Yes, it includes the full history, including tags
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Poms cannot be changed *after* release.
No, but you can release a new one.
There may even be some CVS references in early POMs; that does not
mean the ASF has not migrated away from CVS.
Quite so. And I can't remember a single
2015-05-08 21:55 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Le 08/05/2015 17:55, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Yes, it includes the full history, including tags.
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Yes, it includes the full history, including tags.
Seems reasonable to drop then.
hm, the problem may be, that the scm section of the poms in the pre-git
releases point to the svn location.
We could make the svn repo
On 9 May 2015 at 13:17, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
hm, the problem may be, that the scm section of the poms in the pre-git
releases point to the svn location.
If so, then the project hasn't
Is there any point in keeping the SVN repos for components that have
moved to Git?
They are read-only (or should be) and are not synchronised with the
Git repo, so they can be confusing.
If there is a need to keep them, they should be renamed so people
cannot accidentally use them.
It might be
Le 08/05/2015 17:55, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Yes, it includes the full history, including tags.
Luc
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 5/8/2015 8:53 AM, sebb wrote:
Is there any point in keeping the SVN
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 5/8/2015 8:53 AM, sebb wrote:
Is there any point in keeping the SVN repos for components that have
moved to Git?
They are read-only (or should be) and are not synchronised with
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Le 08/05/2015 17:55, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Do the Git repos include the Subversion commit history?
Yes, it includes the full history, including tags.
Seems reasonable to drop then.
Gary
Luc
Adrian Crum
10 matches
Mail list logo
