Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58
Thanks! :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 98.222% when pulling
**49c25105742f9dc75a1a5
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/12601363)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 98.222% when pulling
**49c25105742f9dc75a1a5
Github user TheRealHaui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58
You're welcome!
Here we go regarding the exception detection code style.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/58
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/12564700/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/12564700)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 98.222% when pulling
**82504951d523da304474b