Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

Le 20/10/2015 08:32, Sergio Fernández a écrit : > Double check would be good, since I could missed any. I think most are old > versions, and given the package naming in Debian are still there. How many > components do actually still use Ant as build system? Another way to find the source

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

These are all packages in currently in Debian: https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libcommons Checking the unstable distribution (the most recently updated package), these are the packages I saw still depending on ant to build (Build-Depends): * libcommons-cli-java 1.3.1-2:

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

+1 On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:39 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) : > > > > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. > > > > > > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant > >

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

I have quite some experience building Debian packages with Maven (e.g., see the jdeb build for Marmotta https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/launchers/marmotta-webapp/pom.xml#L124), so I can help porting the ant task for commons-lang. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm)

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

On 19 October 2015 at 10:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) : > >> > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. >> > >> > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant >> > build file

AW: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

> > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. > > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant > build file to explain this requirement. Haven't looked at the build script. But maybe you could keep only that part producing the Debian packages and use Maven

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) : > > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. > > > > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant > > build file to explain this requirement. > > > Haven't looked at the build script. > But

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

2015-10-19 15:11 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández : > Has anybody read my previous mail? > > Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea what > the setup between the Commons project and the Java Packaging team at > Debian. Maybe I could ask at

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-10-19 15:11 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández : > > > Has anybody read my previous mail? > > > > Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea > what > > the setup between the

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

Has anybody read my previous mail? Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea what the setup between the Commons project and the Java Packaging team at Debian. Maybe I could ask at debian-j...@lists.debian.org... On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, James Carman

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

OK, got what they told me https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2015/10/msg00083.html And is only used to package version 2.x as libcommons-lang-java, and libcommons-lang3-java has already been moved to Maven. So Ant build could be safely removed in 3.x, I think. I've created LANG-1175 to track

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

2015-10-19 21:36 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger : > So is this a global decision, should we drop ant support for all Commons > components? I think there are only a few still maintaining an ant build, > and there is no guarantee that these build.xml files are up-to-date. > I

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

So is this a global decision, should we drop ant support for all Commons components? I think there are only a few still maintaining an ant build, and there is no guarantee that these build.xml files are up-to-date. Oliver Am 19.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb James Carman: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 19,

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

Le 17/10/2015 10:41, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Any idea how we can find out whether this is the case? For the reference, there is a Debian Sources site [1] where the source packages can be viewed. The relevant file to check is debian/control [2] for the current version in the sid suite (i.e.

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

+1, drop it On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintaining > the Ant build causes trouble. For example I often forget to synchronize > changes I make to the dependencies in pom.xml

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

t; From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Sent: Saturday, 17 October 2015 4:41 AM > Subject: [LANG] Drop Ant build? > > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintai

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-10-16 22:32 GMT+02:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita > : > >> +1 if not being used/maintained anymore. >> >> I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. >> > > Any idea how we can find out whether this is the case? And what does it help,

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

/p7csfevec5uqdqhb HTHBruno From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Cc: ebo...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, 17 October 2015 9:41 PM Subject: Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build? 2015-10-16 22:32 GMT+02:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

+1 Gary On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintaining > the Ant build causes trouble. For example I often forget to synchronize > changes I make to the dependencies in pom.xml with

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

Me neither. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > I don't see any point in keeping the Ant build, TBH. > > Matt > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Maven has been our leading build system for a

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

+1 if not being used/maintained anymore. I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. Bruno From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Saturday, 17 October 2015 4:41 AM Subject: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

[LANG] Drop Ant build?

Hi, Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintaining the Ant build causes trouble. For example I often forget to synchronize changes I make to the dependencies in pom.xml with the ant build. Are there any objections against removing the Ant build from the project? BR,

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

his requirement. > Bruno > > From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Sent: Saturday, 17 October 2015 4:41 AM > Subject: [LANG] Drop Ant build? > > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build syste

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

+1, definitely Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintaining > the Ant build causes trouble. For example I often forget to synchronize > changes I make to the dependencies in pom.xml with the ant build. > > Are there any objections

Re: [LANG] Drop Ant build?

I don't see any point in keeping the Ant build, TBH. Matt On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > Maven has been our leading build system for a long time now. Maintaining > the Ant build causes trouble. For example I often forget to synchronize >