Am Sun, 05 Nov 2017 08:43:06 -0700 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> It sounds like we all like the idea of this new component. I'll create
> the git repo tonight or by tomorrow morning at the latest.
Hehe, it seems this idea pops up every decade ...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/dormant/test/
Tha
I still have some code lying around in this area. Need refreshing though :
http://mvdb.org/projects/beanunit/
It tests getters and setters automagically.
Maybe because of the magic code involved the code is not very "clean"
and maybe not suitable for a commons test component.
Mvgr,
Martin
On Sa
I don't know if this fits but I have junit-contract-testing (
https://github.com/Claudenw/junit-contracts) that I would like to
contribute.
It is an extension that performs contract tests for java interface
implementations.
Cluade
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All,
> resource
> >>> leak) can be used independent of the Unit Test Framework.
> >>>
> >>
> > Do you have such a gadget?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> Gruss
> >>> Bernd
> >>> --
> >>>
Framework.
>>>
>>
> Do you have such a gadget?
>
> Gary
>
>
>>
>>> Gruss
>>> Bernd
>>> --
>>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>>>
>>> From: Hasan Diwan
>>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2
[PROPOSAL REDUX]
Component Name: Apache Commons Testing
A multi-module project focused on providing code for testing applications
using various testing frameworks with an initial focus on JUnit 4.
Modules:
commons-testing: no dependencies, contains code like to list all non-daemon
threads after
dget?
Gary
>
>> Gruss
>> Bernd
>> --
>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>>
>> From: Hasan Diwan
>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>>
>&g
ing-ftp-server.
Gary
>
>
> Le 4 nov. 2017 05:45, "Bruno P. Kinoshita"
> a écrit :
>
> > +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> > CheersBruno
> >
> > From: Matt Sicker
> > To: Commons Developers List
>
about the Name and the Mission and less about the maven
structure.
Gruss
Bernd
Von: Gary Gregory
Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2017 18:12
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
So are you advocating for a multi-module project?
- commons-testing
- commons-testing
independent of the Unit Test Framework.
>>
>> Gruss
>> Bernd
>> --
>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>>
>> From: Hasan Diwan
>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re
ommons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>
> How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H
>
> On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> > pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
Framework.
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> From: Hasan Diwan
> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>
> How about "Ap
tp://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> From: Hasan Diwan
> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>
> How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H
>
> On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary
Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H
On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pasca
epau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> >>> CheersBruno
> >>>
> >>>From: Matt Sicker
> >>> To: Commons Developers List
> >>> Sent: Sat
a <
>> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
>>> CheersBruno
>>>
>>> From: Matt Sicker
>>> To: Commons Developers List
>>> Sent: Saturday, 4 N
M
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about pulling in
other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General resource
management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in Log4j.
Also, I haven't look
10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> CheersBruno
>
> From: Matt Sicker
> To: Commons Developers List
> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
> Subjec
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/11/17 23:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit".
>
> -1 on the name. It is infringing.
>
> "Apache Commons Tools for JUnit" would be fine. As would any similar
> cons
gt;> To: Commons Developers List
>> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>>
>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about pulling in
>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing
On 03/11/17 23:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit".
-1 on the name. It is infringing.
"Apache Commons Tools for JUnit" would be fine. As would any similar
construction.
> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code l
An: Bruno P. Kinoshita; Commons Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>
> Looks like a good idea but wonder if it fits commons. I kind of see a
> lot of modules already so maybe incubator?
>
> Ps: if interesting I m happy to give
> https://gi
it :
> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> CheersBruno
>
> From: Matt Sicker
> To: Commons Developers List
> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
>
> I certainly like the idea,
+1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
CheersBruno
From: Matt Sicker
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about pulling
I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about pulling in
other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General resource
management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in Log4j.
Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit 5.x as well
Sounds like a logical category of reusable components. I'm a lurker but I
think that is a very very cool idea!
On Nov 3, 2017 4:11 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit".
>
> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code
Hi All,
I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit".
The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit rules.
This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only.
For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit.SetDefaultLocaleTestRule
I have other rules s
27 matches
Mail list logo
