On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:36:11 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Dave Brosius
wrote:
I'd vote for putting down the paint brushes temporarily and consider
the
bike shed done.
Let's get 1.0 out, and then folks can work on 1.1 while getting
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> Dave Brosius wrote:
>
> > I'd just release it, and
> > get some momentum going.
>
+1
Dave Brosius wrote:
> i think people understand an early product having breaking changes. The
> interface is 'small' enough that having to redo a small amount of change
> by clients is not an issue here. Whatever you do, it's likely that you
> will get feedback from clients that you don't expect,
i think people understand an early product having breaking changes. The
interface is 'small' enough that having to redo a small amount of change
by clients is not an issue here. Whatever you do, it's likely that you
will get feedback from clients that you don't expect, which probably
prompts
Le 6/10/2016 à 19:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> But is the painting considered for 1.1 in risk of breaking BC? If yes, we
> need to keep talking or accept that the next release would be a BC-breaking
> 2.0. Both are fine with me, we just need to agree on a road-map.
Or we publish now a beta
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> I'd vote for putting down the paint brushes temporarily and consider the
> bike shed done.
>
> Let's get 1.0 out, and then folks can work on 1.1 while getting feedback
> from users, etc.
>
But is the painting considered
I'd vote for putting down the paint brushes temporarily and consider the
bike shed done.
Let's get 1.0 out, and then folks can work on 1.1 while getting feedback
from users, etc.
--dave
---
On 2016-10-06 11:10, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:04:43 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le
Le 6/10/2016 à 17:10, Gilles a écrit :
> Well, you started them.
Look, you replied to my message with 100 lines of text, this happens
with each of your messages. Sorry but I can't keep up, my time is too
limited. Please be synthetic.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:04:43 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 5/10/2016 à 18:01, Gilles a écrit :
There hasn't been any repository activity concerned
with the above reports or other such new features.
Were there unanticipated problems?
Just lengthy (and not yet finished) discussions :)
Le 5/10/2016 à 18:01, Gilles a écrit :
> There hasn't been any repository activity concerned
> with the above reports or other such new features.
>
> Were there unanticipated problems?
Just lengthy (and not yet finished) discussions :) I'm still working on
the LCG.
Emmanuel Bourg
Hello.
Two weeks ago, we informally agreed on a two-weeks delay
of the release:
http://markmail.org/message/brhdpc5hwjebc2z3
http://markmail.org/message/kpc2brclkr5fyzoo
http://markmail.org/message/7fr3aulx4inpplnw
in order to accommodate additional RNG implementations:
11 matches
Mail list logo