Hello.
Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:41, Eric Barnhill a écrit :
>
> Sorry I misspoke. Anyway I quite agree, it would work well as
> commons-distribution. +1
No problem. :)
If you have time, some "little" things would be:
* review the distribution classes and ensure that the conventions are uniform
Sorry I misspoke. Anyway I quite agree, it would work well as
commons-distribution. +1
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:29 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:23, Eric Barnhill a
> écrit :
> >
> > I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported.
> >
> > You are proposing
Hi.
Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 18:23, Eric Barnhill a écrit :
>
> I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported.
>
> You are proposing releasing it outside of numbers?
Code is currently in module "commons-statistics-distribution", within
the [Statistics] component (actually: the sole non-emp
I agree, distributions seems stable and well supported.
You are proposing releasing it outside of numbers?
I think it's a good idea. +1
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Most functionality of the "o.a.c.math4.distribution" package was migrated
> from Commons Ma
Hello.
Most functionality of the "o.a.c.math4.distribution" package was migrated
from Commons Math almost 2 years ago.
The [Statistics] component should also host a refactoring of CM's "stat"
package but development has stalled. Obviously, it is unlikely that we can
perform this task in the short
