This VOTE thread is canceled to address testing on Java 8.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> Agree that my other negatives are not blockers, but we really should be
> supporting building with Java 1.8 when that is the current version.
>
> I
Agree that my other negatives are not blockers, but we really should be
supporting building with Java 1.8 when that is the current version.
I would love to have a quick look; the errors hint it is just a bug in the
test, but I'm a bit stretched right now, so I can't make a firm promise..
On 6 Jun
Hello Gary,
Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 7. Juni 2016 um
07:31 Uhr:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> > Gary Gregory schrieb am Mo., 6. Juni 2016 um
> > 23:34 Uhr:
> >
> > >
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory schrieb am Mo., 6. Juni 2016 um
> 23:34 Uhr:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Gary,
> > >
> >
Hello Gary,
Gary Gregory schrieb am Mo., 6. Juni 2016 um
23:34 Uhr:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> > unfortunately I have to vote -1 for two reasons:
> >
> > 1. tag name does not follow tag naming
Sebb: Thank you for you review.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> STATUS.html and PROPOSAL.html are missing from the source archive.
>
Crud, same as 1.9.2. Will fix in trunk.
>
> Otherwise hashes and sigs and content agree with SVN.
>
> I get the following test
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> unfortunately I have to vote -1 for two reasons:
>
> 1. tag name does not follow tag naming convention, although I brought this
> up when the tag was created initially. Looking at the other tags, it
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> Thanks for putting this RC together, Gary, a BeanUtils release is most
> welcome.
>
> Unfortunately, my vote: -1 (binding)
>
> .. because the build fails in Windows.
>
> Checked:
>
> +1 signatures
> +1 sha1 hashes
>
STATUS.html and PROPOSAL.html are missing from the source archive.
Otherwise hashes and sigs and content agree with SVN.
I get the following test failures with Java8 on MacOSX
Failed tests:
IndexedPropertyTestCase.testArrayListIndexedPropertyDescriptor:175
Not IndexedPropertyDescriptor
Hello Gary,
unfortunately I have to vote -1 for two reasons:
1. tag name does not follow tag naming convention, although I brought this
up when the tag was created initially. Looking at the other tags, it should
be BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC1
2. Build fails with:
On 6 June 2016 at 15:51, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> .. because the build fails in Windows.
Or with Maven 3.3 and JDK 1.8.
> I see BeanUtils is not listed on
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Commons/ so I'll add it there.
Added as
Thanks for putting this RC together, Gary, a BeanUtils release is most welcome.
Unfortunately, my vote: -1 (binding)
.. because the build fails in Windows.
Checked:
+1 signatures
+1 sha1 hashes
+1 LICENSE, NOTICE
+1 RELEASE-NOTES.txt
-1 no README
+1 mvn apache-rat check
-1 What is the file
Hello Gary,
I'll have a look later today.
Benedikt
Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um
02:24 Uhr:
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1 is available for review here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/
> (revision 13874)
>
>
Am 03.06.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> On Jun 3, 2016 12:53 PM, "Oliver Heger"
> wrote:
>>
>> Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look
> good.
>>
>> The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing
>>
On Jun 3, 2016 12:53 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
>
> Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look
good.
>
> The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing
> BEANUTILS-477, but this is not blocking.
>
> I ran the tests
Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good.
The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing
BEANUTILS-477, but this is not blocking.
I ran the tests for [configuration] with the new jar and got a single
test failure which seems to be caused
Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/
(revision 13874)
commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.tar.gz
(SHA1: 5c66783bb2bce21992cc3515a7b78f36f17c8709)
commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.zip
(SHA1:
17 matches
Mail list logo