Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-16 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
[x] +1 Release these artifacts Build passing from tag, with `mvn clean install site`, on: Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4 Java version: 1.8.0_252, vendor: Private Build, runtime:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
May I get more reviews please? Gary On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 9:42 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Lang 3.10 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons Lang 3.11. > > Apache Commons Lang 3.11

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
My +1 Gary On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 9:42 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Lang 3.10 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons Lang 3.11. > > Apache Commons Lang 3.11 RC2 is available for review

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (non binding) built from sources and run tests (Fedora + AdoptOpenJDK14) tested with a few projects checked sigs and checksums Enrico Il giorno mar 14 lug 2020 alle ore 02:58 Rob Tompkins ha scritto: > +1 > > Validated Java 8 and Java 11 > > Validated signatures - working on a signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-13 Thread Rob Tompkins
+1 Validated Java 8 and Java 11 Validated signatures - working on a signature validation shell script (still in progress https://github.com/chtompki/notes/blob/master/commons-release-validation/mover-downloader-and-validator.sh

Re: [all] release validation (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2)

2020-07-13 Thread sebb
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 15:15, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I'm still of the opinion that verifying the GPG signature is logically > sufficient since they include the message digest by nature of how they > work. It is particularly useful because .asc files can be safely > mirrored unlike checksum files

Re: [all] release validation (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2)

2020-07-13 Thread Matt Sicker
I'm still of the opinion that verifying the GPG signature is logically sufficient since they include the message digest by nature of how they work. It is particularly useful because .asc files can be safely mirrored unlike checksum files which can be maliciously modified. On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at

[all] release validation (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2)

2020-07-12 Thread Rob Tompkins
given the consistency of the signatures from the plugins…do we need to check them for releases anymore? I have been using shell scripts to validate all of the md5’s, sha1’s, sha512’s, and gpg signatures that come out of the process. @sebb or @markt do you have an opinion here? -Rob > On Jul

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-12 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons Lang 3.10 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Lang 3.11. Apache Commons Lang 3.11 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/3.11-RC2 (svn