Thanks, Stian, that's exactlywas I was expecting.
So I formally CANCEL this VOTE, and I'll prepare a RC3 in the next few
days. includihe fix for COMMONSRDF-69..
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> Good effort, Sergio! Sorry for late review.
> I
Stian--
Just a quick technical question (really my own curiosity): I see you built with
`mvn clean install -T1.0C` (explicitly calling out the thread count). Is that
for reproducibility or some other reason?
ajs6f
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
Good effort, Sergio! Sorry for late review.
I guess you didn't get to many replies as there was confusion with the
dist/svn revision.. :-(
Sorry, my vote is -1 (binding)
.. as META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE are missing in the binary
JARs in the maven repo.
(Not sure how I missed this
I'd like to bring up this vote, which is waiting for votes for two weeks :-/
On Nov 26, 2017 13:21, "Sergio Fernández" wrote:
I'd like to ask the Commons PMC to cast a, any, vote for this RC. Because
it's stuck. It's fine to get -1s, but at least something to move forward.
I'd like to ask the Commons PMC to cast a, any, vote for this RC. Because
it's stuck. It's fine to get -1s, but at least something to move forward.
Thanks.
On Nov 22, 2017 17:52, "Sergio Fernández" wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> thanks for the feedback on RC2. Please, find my
Hi Oliver,
thanks for the feedback on RC2. Please, find my answers inline.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.6:site (default-cli) on
> project commons-rdf-parent:
Hi Sergio,
build works fine with Java 1.8 on Windows 10. However, the site build
fails for me with the following error:
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Commons RDF
BTW, my +1 (non-binding).
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> > I read that Commons policy. The
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> > I read that Commons policy. The issues is that I didn't get that email,
> and
> > I couldn't find how to easily gather those checksums given the
On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández
>> wrote:
>> > Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 RC2 is available
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
> > Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 RC2 is available for review at (r23205):
> >
> >
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> once we addressed most of the issues from RC1, I'd like to propose to
> release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2.
>
> Apache Commons RDF aims to provide a common Java API for RDF 1.1 graphs and
> datasets.
l good.
>
>
>Thanks for preparing this new release.
>
>Cheers,
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>From: Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.or
__
From: Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2017 11:08 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2
Hi,
once we addressed most of
nt: Monday, 20 November 2017 11:08 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2
Hi,
once we addressed most of the issues from RC1, I'd like to propose to
release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2.
Apache Commons RDF aims to provide a common Java API for RDF 1.1 gra
Hi,
once we addressed most of the issues from RC1, I'd like to propose to
release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2.
Apache Commons RDF aims to provide a common Java API for RDF 1.1 graphs and
datasets. API bindings in Commons RDF 0.5.0 include Apache Jena, Eclipse
RDF4J, JSON-LD Java as
16 matches
Mail list logo