On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> As I haven’t gotten any votes on this thread I’m going to cancel for
> another attempt at building instructions along with adding the docker
> infrastructure with the project.
>
Would it be simpler to provide instructions without Docker in pl
As I haven’t gotten any votes on this thread I’m going to cancel for another
attempt at building instructions along with adding the docker infrastructure
with the project.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 10:35 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Commons Jelly 1.0.1 RC3 is available for
I missing a basic step because I have 0 files in my "root@b54fab629a9f
:~/commons-jelly-1.X#"
Arg.
Also, I would like to have BUILDING.md tell me which ant command to run to
validate the build...
Gary
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Give the docker setup thats in the 1.X b
Give the docker setup thats in the 1.X branch a shot…it’s all there so you
should (assuming that you have jdk-1_5_0_22-linux-amd64.bin downloaded) just
be able to run your docker build.
Gary - can you give it a shot? And this is enjoying my weekend :-)
If we can get your build working Gary, t
On Sep 2, 2017 12:58, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
Pardon that the code isn’t in the trunk, but I’ve been trying to work with
minimal remedial changes based on the issue that we were trying to solve
here hence the contrivance of a release process.
Had I been working off trunk I probably would have trie
Pardon that the code isn’t in the trunk, but I’ve been trying to work with
minimal remedial changes based on the issue that we were trying to solve here
hence the contrivance of a release process.
Had I been working off trunk I probably would have tried to go with the
mavenized build, but then
I believe trunk & tag are different as the release process is normally done in
a branch (see branches/1.X, I think that one was used). I believe it is normal
they may have a few different files related to build/site/release. After the
release the main branch (i.e. trunk/master/etc) gets updated
right, BUILDING.md is not in trunk!
Gary
On Sep 2, 2017 12:05, "Amey Jadiye" wrote:
> That would be really nice, also why trunk and tag don't looks similar ?
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 2, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> > >
> > > I
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> That would be really nice, also why trunk and tag don't looks similar ?
>
> Is this something we added recently and not present in trunk ? I saw
BUILDING.md only in tag, whatever written in .md is ok thought its good to
simply have Dockerfile
That would be really nice, also why trunk and tag don't looks similar ?
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, I did not find the Dockerfile in repository, where can i get
> > install.sh ? what are you tryi
I just want instructions that work :-)
I'll leave it up to you to choose whether you want an RC4 or figure out
here how to get a build going with the current guide.
Thank you,
Gary
On Sep 2, 2017 11:56, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
> >
> > I'm s
> On Sep 2, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I did not find the Dockerfile in repository, where can i get
> install.sh ? what are you trying here ?
>
Since you and Gary couldn't immediately figure it out? You think I should
simply automate all of that with one command goin
Please read the BUILDING.md file.
Gary
On Sep 2, 2017 11:42, "Amey Jadiye" wrote:
> I'm sorry, I did not find the Dockerfile in repository, where can i get
> install.sh ? what are you trying here ?
>
> Regards,
> Amey
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > Having a bit
I'm sorry, I did not find the Dockerfile in repository, where can i get
install.sh ? what are you trying here ?
Regards,
Amey
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Having a bit of trouble with getting Docker up and running:
>
> C:\temp\rc\test>docker build -t commons-jelly-build
That looks like it can't download the jar dependencies. Strange. I'm away from
my machine currently, so I'll give it a closer look in 1hour or so.
-Rob
> On Sep 2, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Having a bit of trouble with getting Docker up and running:
>
> C:\temp\rc\test>docke
Having a bit of trouble with getting Docker up and running:
C:\temp\rc\test>docker build -t commons-jelly-build-env .
Sending build context to Docker daemon 48.57MB
Step 1/9 : FROM library/ubuntu:12.04
---> 5b117edd0b76
Step 2/9 : RUN apt-get -qq update && apt-get install -y curl wget pgp
subver
Hello,
Commons Jelly 1.0.1 RC3 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jelly (svn revision 21410)
The tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jelly/tags/commons-jelly-1.0.1-RC3
Commit the tag points at:
1807023
Maven Artifacts:
17 matches
Mail list logo