On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hashes sigs look fine
There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs
directory and the
javadoc jar.
Noted; will investigate.
The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo
except for all
IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580).
Some minor issues though in the docs:
- download page goes nowhere, I suspect
Officially cancelling this vote, blah blah...
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with
the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/
The tag is here:
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hashes sigs look fine
There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs
directory and the
javadoc jar.
This is caused by the javadoc plugin, apparently. The
options file appears to be something that specifying
debugtrue/debug in the plugin's
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Wiki:
- talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-)
mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of
releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come up
with a release plan. Should a release plan be
obliterated
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Wiki:
- talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-)
mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of
releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come
up
Everything looks fine, but a mvn site:site fails for me with the error
message Embedded error: conf\findbugs-exclude-filter.xml (File cannot
be found.) This file seems to be missing in the source distribution
(there is no conf directory at all).
Oliver
Matt Benson schrieb:
Thanks to anyone
Hashes sigs look fine
There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the
javadoc jar.
The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars don't contain anything useful.
I expect this is a Maven feature, but that does not mean that it is correct ;-)
I think the manifests should
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC.
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Matt,
Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo except for all
IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580).
Some minor issues though in the
On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Issue in the POM:
- it defines a property commons.release.version with value 1.2. This is
used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download page in
xdocs. Therefore currently all liks are generated for JXPath 1.2.
On 05/07/2008, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Issue in the POM:
- it defines a property commons.release.version with value 1.2. This is
used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download page in
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you
will do another RC.
So... can you explain again what is the effect of
moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement
section of the POM?
Thanks,
Matt
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Matt,
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hashes sigs look fine
There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs
directory and the
javadoc jar.
Noted; will investigate.
The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars
don't contain anything useful.
I expect this is a Maven feature, but
Hi Matt,
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you
will do another RC.
So... can you explain again what is the effect of
moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement
section of the POM?
jxpath does
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:04 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Matt,
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you
will do another RC.
So... can you explain again what is the effect of
moving [logging] to
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC4/
Site:
16 matches
Mail list logo