Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hashes sigs look fine There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the javadoc jar. Noted; will investigate. The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Matt, Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo except for all IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580). Some minor issues though in the docs: - download page goes nowhere, I suspect

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-11 Thread Matt Benson
Officially cancelling this vote, blah blah... --- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the previous release candidates. The artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/ The tag is here:

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hashes sigs look fine There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the javadoc jar. This is caused by the javadoc plugin, apparently. The options file appears to be something that specifying debugtrue/debug in the plugin's

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Matt Benson wrote: --- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Wiki: - talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-) mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come up with a release plan. Should a release plan be obliterated

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-11 Thread Matt Benson
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Benson wrote: --- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Wiki: - talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-) mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come up

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Everything looks fine, but a mvn site:site fails for me with the error message Embedded error: conf\findbugs-exclude-filter.xml (File cannot be found.) This file seems to be missing in the source distribution (there is no conf directory at all). Oliver Matt Benson schrieb: Thanks to anyone

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread sebb
Hashes sigs look fine There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the javadoc jar. The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars don't contain anything useful. I expect this is a Maven feature, but that does not mean that it is correct ;-) I think the manifests should

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC. Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Matt, Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo except for all IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580). Some minor issues though in the

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ Issue in the POM: - it defines a property commons.release.version with value 1.2. This is used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download page in xdocs. Therefore currently all liks are generated for JXPath 1.2.

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread sebb
On 05/07/2008, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/08, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ Issue in the POM: - it defines a property commons.release.version with value 1.2. This is used by the download-page-template.xml to generate the download page in

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Matt Benson
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC. So... can you explain again what is the effect of moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement section of the POM? Thanks, Matt Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Matt,

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Matt Benson
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hashes sigs look fine There is an extraneous 'options' file in the apidocs directory and the javadoc jar. Noted; will investigate. The Manifest files in the source and javadoc jars don't contain anything useful. I expect this is a Maven feature, but

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Matt, Matt Benson wrote: --- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC. So... can you explain again what is the effect of moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement section of the POM? jxpath does

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-05 Thread simon
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:04 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Matt, Matt Benson wrote: --- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you will do another RC. So... can you explain again what is the effect of moving [logging] to

[VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC4

2008-07-03 Thread Matt Benson
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the previous release candidates. The artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/ The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC4/ Site: