On 11/13/2013 10:59 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2013 05:39 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> For IBM JDK 6: I did already ignore several tests (due to problems with
> t
On 11/11/2013 10:12 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC3.
>
> Changes since RC2:
>
> * [COLLECTIONS-499] Refactored the test framework for Bag
> implementations to extend from "AbstractCollectionTest" by
> deco
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 11:04 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>
>>> the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
>>> with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with t
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 05:39 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
[snip]
For IBM JDK 6: I did already ignore several tests (due to problems with
the TreeMap implementation there) if run with this JVM but obvi
On 11/13/2013 11:04 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
>> with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with the
>> ones in MultiValueMap and MultiMap. We s
On 11/13/2013 05:39 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>
>>> the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
>>> with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with the
>>> ones in
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
>> with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with the
>> ones in MultiValueMap and MultiMap. We should change the retur
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
> with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with the
> ones in MultiValueMap and MultiMap. We should change the return type to be
> compatible.
This me
Hi Joerg,
the failure for JDK 1.8 is clear: this version updated the Map interface
with a new method boolean remove(Object, Object) which clashes with the
ones in MultiValueMap and MultiMap. We should change the return type to be
compatible.
For IBM JDK 6: I did already ignore several tests (due
Hi Thomas,
I've downloaded the source tar.gz and tested it with my compiler zoo.
1/ IBM JDK 1.5 fails with compilation error (without telling where or why).
2/ Sun JDK 1.5 compiles and runs tests fine, using these class files to run
the tests:
2.1/ IBM JDK 1.6 runs tests with 5 failures / 15 err
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC3.
Changes since RC2:
* [COLLECTIONS-499] Refactored the test framework for Bag
implementations to extend from "AbstractCollectionTest" by
decorating the concrete Bag instance with a CollectionBag or
Coll
11 matches
Mail list logo