RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Gary, Gary Gregory wrote at Monday, 5. April 2010 18:16: Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of another use for a test jar file. What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a maintenance of a commons component (from x.y.n to x.y.n+1) is

RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-06 Thread Gary Gregory
...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 21:34 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon] Would love to see this. I'll go and put the historic Lang ones together if you let me know how you'd like it to look. Hen On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:16 AM

RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of another use for a test jar file. What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a maintenance of a commons component (from x.y.n to x.y.n+1) is that there is 100% binary compatibility. As part of the build

Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread Matt Benson
Is it not sufficient to simply run clirr reports before a release? -Matt On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of another use for a test jar file. What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a

RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread Gary Gregory
: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:00 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon] Is it not sufficient to simply run clirr reports before a release? -Matt On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: Seeing the discussion about [daemon

Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread sebb
not be run, just that they may involve a lot of manual checking. Gary -Original Message- From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:00 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon

RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread Gary Gregory
-Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon] On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote: I do not think Clirr is enough

Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread sebb
On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote: -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon] On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory

Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]

2010-04-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Would love to see this. I'll go and put the historic Lang ones together if you let me know how you'd like it to look. Hen On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote: Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of another use for a