> > > So unless the is a great performance improvement, I don't think it's
> > > worth the extra overheads.
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 09:25, Bernd Eckenfels
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ... and also do bench
native interface overhead
> might be a problem so that pure java (intrinsic) code is much faster
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> > > >
> > > > Von: Ga
gt; --
> > > http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> > > ________
> > > Von: Gary Gregory
> > > Gesendet: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:45:26 PM
> > > An: Commons Developers List
> > > Betreff: Re: [crypto] Interest in adding support fo
> > Von: Gary Gregory
> > Gesendet: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:45:26 PM
> > An: Commons Developers List
> > Betreff: Re: [crypto] Interest in adding support for cryptographic hash
> > function?
> >
> > That sounds reason
ace overhead might be
> > a problem so that pure java (intrinsic) code is much faster
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> >
> > Von: Gary Gregory
> > Gesendet: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:45:26 PM
> &
pure java (intrinsic) code is much faster
>
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: Gary Gregory
> Gesendet: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:45:26 PM
> An: Commons Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [crypto] Interest in adding support for cryptograph
Betreff: Re: [crypto] Interest in adding support for cryptographic hash
function?
That sounds reasonable to me. I think once we see a PR, we'll get a better
idea. Start small IMO.
Gary
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 13:51 Alex Remily wrote:
> I'd be exposing additional elements of the OpenSSL API
That sounds reasonable to me. I think once we see a PR, we'll get a better
idea. Start small IMO.
Gary
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 13:51 Alex Remily wrote:
> I'd be exposing additional elements of the OpenSSL API via additions to the
> commons crypto API. Since I wouldn't be adding any additional
I'd be exposing additional elements of the OpenSSL API via additions to the
commons crypto API. Since I wouldn't be adding any additional
dependencies, I would expect that licensing and portability would remain
unchanged. Would it not?
Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 1:08 PM Gilles
Le sam. 27 févr. 2021 à 19:00, Bernd Eckenfels
a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I don’t think it’s a Good idea to introduce native dependencies to formerly
> pure Java projects.
+1
[I thought that the idea was a (pure) Java implementation.]
> So i think native optimized hash implementations would fit
://Bernd.eckenfels.net
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 6:45:12 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [crypto] Interest in adding support for cryptographic hash
function?
See also
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/apidocs/org/apache
See also
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/apidocs/org/apache/commons/codec/digest/DigestUtils.html
Gary
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 09:58 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le sam. 27 févr. 2021 à 15:51, Alex Remily a
> écrit :
> >
> > I'm working on a project that makes heavy use of
Hi.
Le sam. 27 févr. 2021 à 15:51, Alex Remily a écrit :
>
> I'm working on a project that makes heavy use of hashing, and I'd like to
> use the OpenSSL implementation. Thoughts on adding support for the SHA-2
I'm working on a project that makes heavy use of hashing, and I'd like to
use the OpenSSL implementation. Thoughts on adding support for the SHA-2
and/or Blake2 family into commons crypto? I'm happy to do the work if
there's someone out there willing to review and advise.
Alex
14 matches
Mail list logo
