Hi All,
I plan on doing a release candidate soon with mac binaries as well as a new
aarch64 binary. I hope to get an RC out within a week or so.
Gary
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020, 07:13 sebb wrote:
> It occurs to me that we don't *have* to release binaries.
>
> We could just release the source, as is
interested in).
Thoughts?
Regards,
Matt Juntunen
From: Matt Sicker
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [crypto] Releasing 1.1.0 with Mac64 support
Can convenience binaries be voted on separately from the regular
source
Can convenience binaries be voted on separately from the regular
source release? If so, it might be easier to get the source out first
along with release binaries as they're created.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 at 06:13, sebb wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that we don't *have* to release binaries.
>
> We
It occurs to me that we don't *have* to release binaries.
We could just release the source, as is done by several other ASF
projects (including httpd).
Sebb.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 15:15, Geoffrey Blake wrote:
>
> Hi Gary, has a solution for the Mac build been reached? Do you
> require some
Hi Gary, has a solution for the Mac build been reached? Do you
require some assistance here? As Bindul suggested, Travis has support
for uploading artifacts to AWS S3:
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/uploading-artifacts/
This may alleviate the issue with accepting an unknown artifact, and
with
Hi Gary,
(Please ignore if it has been discussed already)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:07 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks to Geoffrey Blake's help setting up a Docker Ubuntu Trusty (14.04)
> environment, I am working toward creating an RC for 1.1.0, but in order to
> get Mac64
Hi All,
Thanks to Geoffrey Blake's help setting up a Docker Ubuntu Trusty (14.04)
environment, I am working toward creating an RC for 1.1.0, but in order to
get Mac64 support we are quite sure I need to build that binary on a Mac,
which I do not own or have simple access to.
Is there an
