Re: [graph] BST?

2012-02-03 Thread Claudio Squarcella
Hello, On 01/02/2012 17:39, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Gary!!! :) I don't see any issue on adding the BST algorithms you need in [graph], even if you have to reuse the minimum amount of codebase, packages don't usually interact each other very much, unless some DFS/BFS or shortest path is needed

Re: [graph] BST?

2012-02-03 Thread Claudio Squarcella
I completely agree with Simone. I see [graph] as the right place not only for well-known algorithms but also for state-of-the-art results, where graphs are either support structures for computation or actual main data structures fitting the user domain. P.S.: with this I am not saying that

Re: [graph] BST?

2012-02-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Gary!!! :) I don't see any issue on adding the BST algorithms you need in [graph], even if you have to reuse the minimum amount of codebase, packages don't usually interact each other very much, unless some DFS/BFS or shortest path is needed in other algo. I have the plan of adding KDTree