Henri Yandell wrote:
Agreed. I'd never read the javadoc which suggests collections usage
and had assumed we had grander schemes.
Is ObjectUtils.NULL worth keeping?
I think ObjectUtils.NULL is worth keeping, but there should be two
methods that do know about it:
public T wrapNull(T obj) {
The new ObjectUtils.firstNonNull() method checked for both null and the
ObjectUtils.NULL constant object. Since that was the only method with
that behaviour I removed the check for the NULL object.
The question is broader than that... do we want all null checks in
ObjectUtils or [lang] to
The use of ObjectUtils.NULL seems esoteric. If you didn't write this
email, I wouldn't have known of its support.
Paul
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Stephen Colebourne
scolebou...@btopenworld.com wrote:
The new ObjectUtils.firstNonNull() method checked for both null and the
ObjectUtils.NULL
Agreed. I'd never read the javadoc which suggests collections usage
and had assumed we had grander schemes.
Is ObjectUtils.NULL worth keeping?
Hen
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
The use of ObjectUtils.NULL seems esoteric. If you didn't write this
