Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 19:23, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Since tags make sense to see what's been ADDED since 1.0. Well, of course. IMHO even for the additions, the tags are next to useless in Commons components. Gilles > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021, 13:20 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Le sam. 10

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Since tags make sense to see what's been ADDED since 1.0. On Sat, Jul 10, 2021, 13:20 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 18:30, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs? > > I don't think that they add much. > > Gilles > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 18:30, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs? I don't think that they add much. Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Matt Juntunen
Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs? -Matt J On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 9:36 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 13:12, Matt Juntunen > wrote: > > > I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the > > "accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Alex Herbert
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 13:12, Matt Juntunen wrote: > I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the > "accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its active role in modifying > the arguments. > > If there aren't any other changes required, I'll plan on starting the >

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Matt Juntunen
I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the "accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its active role in modifying the arguments. If there aren't any other changes required, I'll plan on starting the release tonight or tomorrow sometime. To confirm, all modules

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Alex Herbert
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 09:19, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 16:21, Alex Herbert a > écrit : > > > > [...] > > SortInPlace > > > > The latter was recently ported from Commons Math. For that class there > is a > > warning about using varargs for the signature of BiConsumer >

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 16:21, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > [...] > SortInPlace > > The latter was recently ported from Commons Math. For that class there is a > warning about using varargs for the signature of BiConsumer double[][]>. It is using accept(double[], double[]...). I am not sure if >

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 12:55, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready > this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and > commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? No,

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-09 Thread Alex Herbert
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 11:55, Matt Juntunen wrote: > If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready > this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and > commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? > > Thanks. Definitely omit

Re: [numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-09 Thread Matt Juntunen
If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct? -Matt J On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Matt Juntunen wrote: > Hello, > > Are we

[numbers] 1.0 Release

2021-07-06 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hello, Are we ready for a 1.0 release of commons-numbers? Any pending updates or blockers? Regards, Matt J