pr 27, 2021, 07:16 sebb wrote:
>
> > I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> > up to fix the website etc.
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson wrote
Seems reasonable.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 07:16 sebb wrote:
> I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> up to fix the website etc.
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson wro
linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le mar. 27 avr. 2021 à 13:17, sebb a écrit :
> I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> up to fix the website etc.
>
> On Sat, 24 Ap
I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
up to fix the website etc.
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release wh
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was
> vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> document. Oh well.
I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1 votes:
FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was
vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
document. Oh well.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb wrote:
>
>
Sounds reasonable to me.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb wrote:
> There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> two open JIRA feature requests.
>
> The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
>
> Is it worth spending any time on this component?
>
> I
Le 23/04/2021 à 01:04, sebb a écrit :
> There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> two open JIRA feature requests.
>
> The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
>
> Is it worth spending any time on this component?
>
> I suspect it should go dormant.
+1
I think it probably should go to dormant. I had a look at found a few users in
mvnrepository [1] and from random internet search [2][3][4]
But no activity as you pointed, and I think we can move it back to proper later
if there's interest from users/devs later. So +1
Bruno
[1]
There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
two open JIRA feature requests.
The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
Is it worth spending any time on this component?
I suspect it should go dormant.
Sebb.
10 matches
Mail list logo
