Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Kamila Molina Orellana
Hi, Sorry for causing the confusion. I mean to include a general subject since I think commons would benefit from the results. However, I pointed out in the content that the work'd be done over commons-rdf. Again, sorry for that. :D Regards, ~Kamila. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Gilles

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:47:01 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid the Need for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a ugly toolchain). IIUC, there must

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > Hello, > > any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the > module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid the Need > for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, any experience with compiling a JAR with old Java and only adding the module-info.jar with a new class Version? Would that allow to avoid the Need for Multi-Release JARs? (of Course it makes a ugly toolchain). Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:19:05 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM,

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
That seems like a good pragmatic way about it. Gary On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 16:08 Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles > >> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
I almost pooped myself on that one Ralph :-) Good one! Gary On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 17:19 Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:17:40 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700,

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8,

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:09:18 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Gilles wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:01:08 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9 Was: Prepare commons to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread ajs6f
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles > wrote: >> Then these modules can define "module-info" files, and an actual build will >> prove that the dependencies are as expected. >> > As

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> On Thu,

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:28 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote: > On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9 Was: Prepare commons to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:09:22 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote: >> >> > On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles >>> wrote: >>> >

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9 Was: Prepare commons to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM, ajs6f wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 2018, at 12:09 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > That's all quite nice but the hard reality is that the tool chains out > > there are simply not ready for JPMS, as I've painfully learned >

Re: Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9 Was: Prepare commons to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, ajs6f wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles wrote: > > Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to > > establish > > (1) which tools requires fixing, > > (2) prepare enhancement requests

Prepare commons RDF to JDK 9 Was: Prepare commons to JDK 9

2018-03-08 Thread ajs6f
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles wrote: > Would it be useful (and interesting as part of GSoC work) to > establish > (1) which tools requires fixing, > (2) prepare enhancement requests for the respective projects, > and in the meantime, adapt the "Commons" build