Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Hi, Am Mo., 20. Aug. 2018 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Benedikt Ritter < brit...@apache.org>: > Hi, > > any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for lang > 3.9 to Java 1.8? > Since there where no objections, I've created a PR for this change:

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

On 2018/08/22 09:45:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò < > ilgro...@apache.org>: > > > On 2018/08/20 17:09:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Hi, Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò < ilgro...@apache.org>: > On 2018/08/20 17:09:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for lang > > 3.9 to Java 1.8? > > +1 > > Wouldn't 4.0 express better

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

On 2018/08/20 17:09:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for lang > 3.9 to Java 1.8? +1 Wouldn't 4.0 express better the change for the minimum required Java version? Regards.

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Also, java.time classes. Gary On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:54 PM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi Matt, > Am Di., 21. Aug. 2018 um 16:12 Uhr schrieb Matt Benson >: > > > Do you have specific new features or deprecations in mind to accompany > the > > bump? > > > > I'd like to add some helpers for

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Hi Matt, Am Di., 21. Aug. 2018 um 16:12 Uhr schrieb Matt Benson : > Do you have specific new features or deprecations in mind to accompany the > bump? > I'd like to add some helpers for working with java.util.Optional for example. There are most certainly more opportunities for new Lang APIs

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Do you have specific new features or deprecations in mind to accompany the bump? Matt On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, 7:00 AM Pascal Schumacher wrote: > +1 > > Am 20. August 2018 19:09:27 MESZ schrieb Benedikt Ritter < > brit...@apache.org>: > >Hi, > > > >any objections against raising the minimum

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

+1 Am 20. August 2018 19:09:27 MESZ schrieb Benedikt Ritter : >Hi, > >any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for >lang >3.9 to Java 1.8? > >Regards, >Benedikt

Re: [LANG] Minimum required Java version for 3.9

Ok by me. Gary On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 11:09 Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > any objections against raising the minimum required Java version for lang > 3.9 to Java 1.8? > > Regards, > Benedikt >