James Carman a écrit :
Well then I might not make the jump to 2.0 then. That way, if we ever
do make the jump to 2.0 (for API incompatibility reasons), we can
change the package name.
There were other reasons to jump to 2.0. Several incompatibles change
will be introduced and the features tha
Well, if there are several incompatible changes, then I would change
the package name.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman a écrit :
>>
>> Well then I might not make the jump to 2.0 then. That way, if we ever
>> do make the jump to 2.0 (for AP
