[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] 902 Optimizers should return best discovered value in case of TooManyEvaluationsException

2012-11-20 Thread Konstantin Berlin
I am ok with option 2. I guess my issue goes to my problem with the general API. The number of iterations is a stopping condition, as well as all the other conditions that are for some reason called convergence conditions. The number of iterations condition is singled out as bad, hence it throws

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] 902 Optimizers should return best discovered value in case of TooManyEvaluationsException

2012-11-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Konstantin Berlin wrote: I am ok with option 2. Thanks. I'll add new constructors if nobody has objections. Please note that by using custom checkers (even those defined in CM), you make some algorithms deviate from their standard behaviour. I guess

RE: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-20 Thread Patrick Meyer
-Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 12:45 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs On 11/19/12 3:31 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:27:41PM -0800, Phil Steitz

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] correlation analysis with NaNs

2012-11-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. [...] Now is as good a time as any to think about how to correctly represent and handle missing data. The unfortunate thing is that in Java working with primitive doubles we are back to the old Fortran days of having no natural representation of a missing value. Sticking

Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component

2012-11-20 Thread Mark Struberg
Heh, the other option has been 'privilator' Catchy as well, and would have given a nice slogan: 'Privilator - I'll be secure, baby' It's a bit less self-explaining though. We are looking forward to use it in Apache BVal, OpenWebBeans, DeltaSpike and probably MyFaces for now. One thing I

Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component

2012-11-20 Thread James Carman
Or, privinator On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Heh, the other option has been 'privilator' Catchy as well, and would have given a nice slogan: 'Privilator - I'll be secure, baby' It's a bit less self-explaining though. We are looking forward to

Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component

2012-11-20 Thread James Carman
AspectJ can weave the callers, but you have to have access to them, so the way you're doing it seems to be safest. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Heh, the other option has been

Re: [math] 902 Optimizers should return best discovered value in case of TooManyEvaluationsException

2012-11-20 Thread Konstantin Berlin
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Konstantin Berlin wrote: I am ok with option 2. Thanks. I'll add new constructors if nobody has objections. Please note that by using custom checkers (even those

Re: [math] 902 Optimizers should return best discovered value in case of TooManyEvaluationsException

2012-11-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:59:07AM -0500, Konstantin Berlin wrote: On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Konstantin Berlin wrote: I am ok with option 2. Thanks. I'll add new constructors if nobody

[CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, Gary and I did some work on CSV-68 Use the Builder Pattern to create CSVFormats [1]. We have implemented a builder for CSVFormats in trunk. It is capable of... ...creating a CSVFormat from scratch by only passing in a delimiter: CSVFormat format = CSVFormat.newBuilder(',').build();

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Gary and I did some work on CSV-68 Use the Builder Pattern to create CSVFormats [1]. We have implemented a builder for CSVFormats in trunk. It is capable of... ...creating a CSVFormat from scratch by only

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Ted Dunning
Surely you meant to say no other commons library. Builder patterns are relatively common. See guava for instance: http://docs.guava-libraries.googlecode.com/git/javadoc/com/google/common/base/Splitter.html On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote: - it has

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hey Ted, no I was referring to the comments of CSV-68, where it was stated that no other CSV library provides validation of the used CSV formats (and hence it can be removed from commons csv entirely). Benedikt 2012/11/20 Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com Surely you meant to say no other

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 20/11/2012 20:01, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : Please share your thoughts about the builder. Sorry Benedikt but I have to say I really don't like this design. I prefer a simpler API for the reasons you mentioned in the disadvantages. The minor improvements from the developer's point of view are

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Ok this is good. Let's see some healthy debating. :) What is the alternate API? To me the bother is the extra build() call, but that's the pattern. Could an alt API be used and co-exist? Is making the ctor an option? It would have to do some validation. Gary On Nov 20, 2012, at 16:59,

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Ted Dunning
Another way of looking at the builder style is that it is Java's way of using keyword arguments for complex constructors. It also allows a reasonable amount of future-proofing. These benefits are hard to replicate with constructors. On the other hand, builder-style patterns are a royal pain

Re: [CSV] Discussion about the new CSVFormatBuilder

2012-11-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 20/11/2012 23:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : Ok this is good. Let's see some healthy debating. :) Until the debate degrades my mental health... What is the alternate API? The pre CSV-68 API. To me the bother is the extra build() call, but that's the pattern. A pattern is not a feature or

Re: svn commit: r1411919 - /commons/proper/csv/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVFormat.java

2012-11-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:22 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Tue Nov 20 23:22:21 2012 New Revision: 1411919 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1411919view=rev Log: Make some methods package-protected to avoid the need for synthetic accessors. TODO consider whether to do

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons IO -

2012-11-20 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Build using Java 1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild X-Continuum-Project-Id: 83 X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons IO Online report :

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1411919 - /commons/proper/csv/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVFormat.java

2012-11-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2012/11/21 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:22 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Tue Nov 20 23:22:21 2012 New Revision: 1411919 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1411919view=rev Log: Make some methods package-protected to avoid the need