On 20 July 2018 at 00:09, Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
>>What is the replacement for Observer/Observable recommended by
>>the JDK developers?
> I believe they suggest to use the PropertyListener which we have right now,
> but are in the java.beans module I think.
> Alternatively, they also suggest i
Are we going to make any fixes to 3.2.x line?
I really doubt it, so the code should be removed from the mirrors and
the download page.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:47:21 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 20 July 2018 at 00:09, Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
What is the replacement for Observer/Observable recommended by
the JDK developers?
I believe they suggest to use the PropertyListener which we have
right now, but are in the java.beans modu
> On Jul 19, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:21:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG
>> 1.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons RNG 1.1.
>>
>> Apache Commons RNG (full distr
I thought we were keeping it around since it is a different major version.
I am fine with removing it. But that means we need to update the site
download page as well.
Gary
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 02:59 sebb wrote:
> Are we going to make any fixes to 3.2.x line?
>
> I really doubt it, so the code
Hello.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:59:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jul 19, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Gilles
wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:21:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons
RNG
1.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache Comm
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:59:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:21:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
We have added some significant enhancements si
On 20 July 2018 at 14:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I thought we were keeping it around since it is a different major version.
Maybe originally, but now I doubt it's needed.
> I am fine with removing it. But that means we need to update the site
> download page as well.
I am happy to do that.
> Ga
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:05 AM sebb wrote:
> On 20 July 2018 at 14:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I thought we were keeping it around since it is a different major
> version.
>
> Maybe originally, but now I doubt it's needed.
>
> > I am fine with removing it. But that means we need to update the s
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:38:51 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:26 AM, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:59:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jul 19, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Gilles
wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:21:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
We have added some sign
Is the VOTE still in progress or are you guys debating whether or not to
cancel it?
Gary
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:46 AM Gilles wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:38:51 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >> On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:26 AM, Gilles
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:54:52 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Is the VOTE still in progress or are you guys debating whether or not
to
cancel it?
Whether you can run:
$ mvn package install -Pcommons-rng-examples
would be a second data point towards that decision. :-)
Gilles
Gary
On Fri, Jul 20
TL;DR: -1
I do not normally validate an RC one module at a time. Why would you do
that?
Also 'install' already does 'package', otherwise, there would be nothing to
install, unless you do weird stuff in a POM.
Running 'mvn clean install' on Java 8 gives me:
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failure
I’m canceling this [VOTE] because of the src.zip containing more than we want.
-Rob
> On Jul 19, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was
> released, so I would like to release Apache Commons RNG 1.1.
>
> Apache Com
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> TL;DR: -1
>
> I do not normally validate an RC one module at a time. Why would you do
> that?
>
> Also 'install' already does 'package', otherwise, there would be nothing to
> install, unless you do weird stuff in a POM.
>
> Running 'm
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:29:50 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
TL;DR: -1
I do not normally validate an RC one module at a time. Why would you
do
that?
Who asks?
Also 'install' already does 'package', otherwise, there would be
nothing to
install, unless you do weird stuff in a POM.
Normally (at
GitHub user sunsuk7tp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/10
POOL-347 : Regard waiting object creation as failure if pool is full and
maxWaitTime passed
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-347
You can merge this pull request into a Git re
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/10
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/18088758)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 85.146% when pulling
**7b3a83479ea3d57c624aa1
darkma773r opened a new pull request #7: Polar and Spherical Coordinates
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/7
Adds support for polar and spherical coordinates (GEOMETRY-7).
This is an automated message from t
19 matches
Mail list logo
