+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:06 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> [This a reboot of the proposal for which the preceding vote
> has just been cancelled.]
>
> Name of component: "Commons Machine Learning"
> Name of "git" repository: "commons-machinelearning"
> Top-level package
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:27 PM Peter Lee wrote:
> I just created a PR in Compress
> https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/189
Thanks!
> IIUC I could create a PR github.com/google/oss-fuzz to include my google
> account in auto_ccs, and I should ask the primary contact, who is
Hi,
I'm planning to use this library, it looks great. I don't have any particular
request, I'm just curious when do you plan to release the 1.4 version?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Gabor
Hi Gabor,
We currently do not have plans to release 1.4. The library is useable as
1.3. If there is something you want in git master that is not in 1.4,
please specify and hopefully a release manager will volunteer.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 10:04 Gabor Höss
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to
Hi Fabian,
Thanks a lot for all this.
> One more thing: Could you perhaps add the following line to the READMEs of
> compress and imaging?
>
I just created a PR in Compress
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/189
Seems I missed a lot these days. :-(
I also got a Google
There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
two open JIRA feature requests.
The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
Is it worth spending any time on this component?
I suspect it should go dormant.
Sebb.
I think it probably should go to dormant. I had a look at found a few users in
mvnrepository [1] and from random internet search [2][3][4]
But no activity as you pointed, and I think we can move it back to proper later
if there's interest from users/devs later. So +1
Bruno
[1]
Le 22/04/2021 à 00:41, sebb a écrit :
>> ---CUT---
>>
>> You might want to read the discussion that proceeded from the
>> previous vote request. [10]
>>
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] Yes.
>> [X] No, because ...
>
> I think it belongs elsewhere.
> However if there are enough Commons developers who
