To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 03/05/2011 07:46, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Hi all again,
unfortunately Discovery 0.5 artifacts haven't be synched yet, can
anybody give us a help, please?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!
That may be an issue with the central repository. I have an artifact on
oss.sonatype.org ready
Hi all again,
unfortunately Discovery 0.5 artifacts haven't be synched yet, can
anybody give us a help, please?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all Repositor
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
> > [...]
> >>Consistency implies that *all* exceptions thrown from CM must behave the
> >>same way. I thus propose to add an interface like (maybe a better name?):
> >>---
> >>interface ContextedException {
> >> void addMessage(Localizable pattern,
> >> Object ... arguments);
>
I'm down with a fever myself and cannot help out ATM.
Gary
On May 2, 2011, at 16:03, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I cannot do any checking for at least 48 hours due to current holiday
> absence of all decent net.
> Stephen
>
> On 29 April 2011 20:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> [Repeating now that
I cannot do any checking for at least 48 hours due to current holiday
absence of all decent net.
Stephen
On 29 April 2011 20:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
> [Repeating now that I've rebuilt the artifacts using Java 1.5]
>
> =
>
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC3 is available he
shall I have to open an Issue so it does?
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think (bin|src)-(.zip|.tar.gz) should be part of Maven
>> ar
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I don't think (bin|src)-(.zip|.tar.gz) should be part of Maven
> artifacts on central repo, having them on the distribution servers is
> enough
"I don't think" doesn't count as a problem that ought to be fixed, isn't it?
--
I Am What I A
Le 02/05/2011 17:07, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 5/1/11 3:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:34:31AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/1/11 6:00 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:48:14PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:53:30PM -0700
On 5/1/11 3:02 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:34:31AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/1/11 6:00 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:48:14PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:53:30PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/
On 5/2/11 1:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 03:18:20PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/1/11 2:29 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:11:00AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/1/11 3:48 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:53:3
I don't think (bin|src)-(.zip|.tar.gz) should be part of Maven
artifacts on central repo, having them on the distribution servers is
enough
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, S
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Yes it is :( Problem is that for discovery-0.5, zip and tar.gz have
> been copied to be sync'ed to central repo :'(
So what? I think that's perfectly fine.
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
---
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> I just realized that maybe artifacts produced by the assembly plugin
> should not be attached[1], WDYT?
In contrary, they should, to make use of all the Maven plugins for signing etc.
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 03:18:20PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/1/11 2:29 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:11:00AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 5/1/11 3:48 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:53:30PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/
16 matches
Mail list logo
