On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
-0
I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a
component. What we advertise, release and support from commons
proper are general purpose libraries that developers can use in
their own applications. This is
Hi,
sebb wrote:
On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
-0
I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a
component. What we advertise, release and support from commons
proper are general purpose libraries that developers can use in
their own
Hi Jonas,
I will provide a patch for
CHAIN-98https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-98tomorow. The
patch will only cover the refactoring of CONTINUE and
COMPLETED processing results.
nice to read that, looking forward to the patch! :)
But, I do not understand how exceptions should
Am 22.06.2013 um 12:57 schrieb Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Hi Jonas,
I will provide a patch for
CHAIN-98https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-98tomorow. The
patch will only cover the refactoring of CONTINUE and
COMPLETED processing results.
nice to read that,
2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Hi,
sebb wrote:
On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
-0
I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a
component. What we advertise, release and support from commons
proper are general
On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Hi,
sebb wrote:
On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
-0
I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a
component. What we
I'm cancelling this vote, as it's not clear we should be releasing our
plugin tools to the general public.
On 21 June 2013 23:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Digest Plugin 0.1 based on RC2
This is the initial release of the digest plugin, which creates
I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
that means maven plugins, so be it.
Gary
On Jun 22, 2013, at 8:53, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Hi,
sebb
what about moving this to maven plugins ?
I'm pretty sure this could help some ASF projects.
NOTE: the Maven sandbox path is open for all committers.
And btw probably won't be hard to promote it and add sebb in maven committers.
My 0.02 AUD
2013/6/22 Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com:
-0
I
On 22 June 2013 15:15, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
what about moving this to maven plugins ?
I'm pretty sure this could help some ASF projects.
But only ASF projects; it assumes specific processes.
NOTE: the Maven sandbox path is open for all committers.
Thanks, that would be a
On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
that means maven plugins, so be it.
This is written as someone who has never released a commons component
and is very grateful for the folks that have done the release work for
the
I've just been told about the Maven Sandbox, which might be a better
place for this and the signfiles plugins.
Investigating
On 22 June 2013 14:27, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm cancelling this vote, as it's not clear we should be releasing our
plugin tools to the general public.
On 21
On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
that means maven plugins, so be it.
This is written as someone who has never released a commons component
and is very grateful for the folks
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
that means maven plugins, so be it.
This is written as someone who has
Am 22.06.2013 19:10, schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
that means maven plugins, so be
There is an existing plugin[1] that supports checksums generation
applying a wider range of digest algorithm, it could help on inspiring
the ASF one.
my 0.02 EU ;)
[1]
http://nicoulaj.github.io/checksum-maven-plugin/examples/using-custom-checksum-algorithms.html
On 22 June 2013 20:39, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
There is an existing plugin[1] that supports checksums generation
applying a wider range of digest algorithm, it could help on inspiring
the ASF one.
Thanks.
The one I wrote is equivalent to that plugins goals file/files,
On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow users
to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
Cheers,
Ajo Fod.
Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev list, Ajo. As Gilles
said on the ticket, its a little
18 matches
Mail list logo
