I have removed the fallback in revision 1519269.
2013/8/31 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
in r1518802 [1] I have introduced some parameter validation. This was the
result of a discussion we had some
Look's like most people are either indifferent or favor NPE. So, do we
change this for [CSV]? The important thing is to give users an expressive
message.
Benedikt
2013/8/30 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
Surprisingly, a lot. At work, we have a lot of frameworky/plugin-type of
code
Does the .gitignore file need an AL header?
-- Forwarded message --
From: brit...@apache.org
Date: 2013/9/1
Subject: svn commit: r1519292 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk: .gitignore
pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Sun Sep 1
It feels to me that this misrepresents the ideas expressed here, or at
least mine ;) I am neither indifferent or favor NPE. I favor IAE, so
does that mean I am nor most people. If a person make these kinds of
statement, we might as well VOTE or argue-discuss some more...!
Gary
On Sep 1, 2013, at
I favor IAE, but I want to make sure we re-visit the decision made for
[lang] when it chose to use NPE instead.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
It feels to me that this misrepresents the ideas expressed here, or at
least mine ;) I am neither
It'd be hard to argue it's an expressive work imo, thus even with a header
there would be nothing licensable.
Hen
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Does the .gitignore file need an AL header?
-- Forwarded message --
From:
