On 12/22/2015 11:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:44:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/21/2015 06:44 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:14:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the JDKRandomGenerator exception
discussion, but I did not want to
On 12/22/15 1:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 21/12/2015 20:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 12/21/15 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:01:33 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/21/15 8:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:06:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:17:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/22/2015 11:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:44:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/21/2015 06:44 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:14:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:41:01 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/21/15 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:01:33 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/21/15 8:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:06:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/20/15 8:41 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015
On Dec 22, 2015 1:27 PM, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
>
> On 12/22/15 12:05 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 2015 8:46 PM, "James Carman"
wrote:
> >> Can you just abandon the ant build?
> >>
> > It's not an Ant build; it's an Antlib to allow Ant
On 12/22/15 12:56 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2015 1:27 PM, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
>> On 12/22/15 12:05 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Dec 21, 2015 8:46 PM, "James Carman"
> wrote:
Can you just abandon the ant build?
>>> It's not
.
One of the point in having exceptions that extends our own root
exception is that users at higher level can catch this top level.
Currently, we don't even advertise properly what we throw. We even
miss to forward upward some exceptions thrown at low level in the
javadoc/signature of out
I agree.
Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but please continue to attach sources
to maven central releases. It's very helpful when the IDE can
automatically download the source of jar and display it.
Thanks,
Pascal
Am 21.12.2015 um 23:24 schrieb Christopher:
Why detach them at all? Why not
Le 22/12/2015 09:14, Pascal Schumacher a écrit :
> I agree.
>
> Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but please continue to attach sources
> to maven central releases. It's very helpful when the IDE can
> automatically download the source of jar and display it.
This is already done.
There is a
Thanks for the explanation and sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 22.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Le 22/12/2015 09:14, Pascal Schumacher a écrit :
I agree.
Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but please continue to attach sources
to maven central releases. It's very helpful when
Hi Matt,
like with Oliver it fails for me for all tested Java versions (Oracle 1.6 to
1.9):
%< ==
[INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.5.3:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ commons-
weaver-maven-plugin ---
[ERROR] Manifest
Hi all,
Le 21/12/2015 20:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 12/21/15 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:01:33 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/21/15 8:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:06:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/20/15 8:41 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> On
Hi, we are using the common-validation for email validation in our project.
Lately we thought about the repeating whitelist updating and considered
switching to checking the domain validity via the MX record.
I was searching for any existing discussion on using DNS lookups as an
optional
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:44:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 12/21/2015 06:44 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:14:16 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I was considering jumping into the JDKRandomGenerator exception
discussion, but I did not want to hijack it.
Not sure if any of you have
Le 22/12/2015 17:44, Ole Ersoy a écrit :
>
> .
>
>> One of the point in having exceptions that extends our own root
>> exception is that users at higher level can catch this top level.
>> Currently, we don't even advertise properly what we throw. We even
>> miss to forward upward some exceptions
On 12/22/15 12:05 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2015 8:46 PM, "James Carman" wrote:
>> Can you just abandon the ant build?
>>
> It's not an Ant build; it's an Antlib to allow Ant users to use the weaver
> component in a manner similar to how Maven users would do
16 matches
Mail list logo