RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Roberts
Passed our Daikon testing. +1 Mark > -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 2:04 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8 > > Benedikt Ritter

Re: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

2016-07-11 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:34 AM, sebb wrote: > > However bundling multiple native binaries is going to make it tricky to > release. > > How will it be done? The native parts will have to be built

Re: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

2016-07-11 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:34 AM, sebb wrote: > However bundling multiple native binaries is going to make it tricky to > release. > How will it be done? The native parts will have to be built separately > and then combined somehow. The way I'd do it is to have separate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

2016-07-11 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 >From src-zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. Reports OK. Clirr: errors known and agreed upon. RAT OK. Builds OK with 'mvn clean site' using: Apache Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT (227085283b6379038ec16f4cf9ad2e8869cef694; 2016-07-06T12:29:12-07:00) Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.4.0-SNAPSHOT\bin\.. Java

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

2016-07-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Oddly, the JIRA report marks this as fixed for 6.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-79 Gary On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site > look good. > > +1 > > Oliver >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

2016-07-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 10.07.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > hopefully the final RC for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 :-) Changes > since RC7: > > - fixed failing build on Windows plattforms > -

Re: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

2016-07-11 Thread sebb
On 11 July 2016 at 09:02, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > About the native binaries, I think we should put them in the same jar > finally. CRYPTO is library, user shouldn't need to specify Platform in > theory. I just checked the jars of JNA and SNAPPY at maven, the jar contains >

RE: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

2016-07-11 Thread Sun, Dapeng
About the native binaries, I think we should put them in the same jar finally. CRYPTO is library, user shouldn't need to specify Platform in theory. I just checked the jars of JNA and SNAPPY at maven, the jar contains native for all the platform their support. For the first release of CRYPTO, I

Re: [CSV] Git Migration

2016-07-11 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, sebb schrieb am Mo., 11. Juli 2016 um 00:12 Uhr: > On 10 July 2016 at 20:44, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > I have pushed some commits and it works. I've updated the site > > documentation with the new location. > > > > How can I move the current SVN tree