[LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

2017-09-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, since we’re getting more and more requests about the deprecation of RandomStringUtils, I’m thinking about releasing the current state of the master branch as 3.6.1. I may have time to push an RC sometime this week. So if you have some fixes you want to include, please do so now. Regards,

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 5 sept. 2017 05:40, "Ralph Goers" a écrit : > On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le 4 sept. 2017 20:44, "Matt Sicker" a écrit : > > You don't duplicate any logging config. You can use both slf4j-api

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-04 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le 4 sept. 2017 20:44, "Matt Sicker" a écrit : > > You don't duplicate any logging config. You can use both slf4j-api and > log4j-api with either logback or log4j2. > > > Except you dont

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 4 sept. 2017 20:44, "Matt Sicker" a écrit : You don't duplicate any logging config. You can use both slf4j-api and log4j-api with either logback or log4j2. Except you dont always have the choice with 2 apis. It also messes up logging lifecycle and setup which needs 2

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-04 Thread Matt Sicker
You don't duplicate any logging config. You can use both slf4j-api and log4j-api with either logback or log4j2. On 4 September 2017 at 00:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > If you ignore the container point - which for me is already blocking - you > have 2 issues with

Re: [BCEL] Breaking changes in 6.1 needed by Tomcat (?)

2017-09-04 Thread Gary Gregory
On Aug 31, 2017 23:41, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: Hi again, > Am 31.08.2017 um 01:38 schrieb sebb : > > On 30 August 2017 at 20:11, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> looking through the JavaDoc comments in the Visitor interface, it

[VFS] toward releasing 2.2

2017-09-04 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, I would live to see a release for VFS so I can pickup some bug fixes. If any one wants to RM, great, otherwise I will have to put that on my TO-DO list. If you want to perform changes, now is the time. The sooner the better. Gary

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

2017-09-04 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:41:55 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 2/09/2017 à 00:50, Gilles a écrit : Because of "Commons" rules, it is not "equivalent": There was a long thread concluding that all modules must be released _together_, and with the same top-level package name and version number.

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

2017-09-04 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 2/09/2017 à 00:50, Gilles a écrit : > Because of "Commons" rules, it is not "equivalent": There was > a long thread concluding that all modules must be released > _together_, and with the same top-level package name and version > number. True, but I don't see this as an issue. > I think