Re: svn commit: r1807421 - /commons/proper/vfs/trunk/BUILDING.txt

> -mvn clirr:check -pl core > +mvn clirr:check -pl commons-vfs2 Hmm, I think it is intentionally only building the core module, if that is no longer required would it be better to completely remove the -pl argument to control partial build? Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

@Ralph: for tomcat you can use their SPI ( https://github.com/apache/meecrowave/blob/trunk/meecrowave-core/src/main/java/org/apache/meecrowave/logging/tomcat/Log4j2Log.java). For tomee it is harder since tomee itself has an API (LogStream) but OWB and cxf uses JUL as API (as mentionned before) and

Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

+1 Am 5. September 2017 07:17:57 MESZ schrieb Benedikt Ritter : >Hi, > >since we’re getting more and more requests about the deprecation of >RandomStringUtils, I’m thinking about releasing the current state of >the master branch as 3.6.1. I may have time to push an RC sometime

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Jelly 1.0.1 based on RC3.

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > As I haven’t gotten any votes on this thread I’m going to cancel for > another attempt at building instructions along with adding the docker > infrastructure with the project. > Would it be simpler to provide

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

Please point me at the doc for how TomEE would expect us to implement it. The doc for Tomcat is at https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/logging.html , which indicates that implementing a Handler is the only option. If you have a better

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Jelly 1.0.1 based on RC3.

As I haven’t gotten any votes on this thread I’m going to cancel for another attempt at building instructions along with adding the docker infrastructure with the project. Cheers, -Rob > On Sep 1, 2017, at 10:35 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Hello, > > Commons Jelly 1.0.1

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #55: TEXT-97: RandomStringGenerator able to pass m...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/55 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

That's what I had in mind, @Thomas: can you say a word on the diff between 2.3 and 2.2 if you have it still in memory please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

> On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hello Benedikt, > > How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? [snip] I’m on board with this if folks are complaining and the original intent was to deprecate things in [lang]. Why not roll

Re: [JCS] missing 2.2 release in jira?

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm 2 questions just to ensure we are aligned and mail didn't loose > information: > > - for trunk: do we move the version to 2.3-SNAPSHOT? > If you expect the next version to include _minor_ changes (like minor

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

@Ralph: not exactly, if you check tomee/meecowave/cxf, all have Logger implementations backed by something else. Integration is more or less good depending the requirements but extending logger you get an implementation almost as fast as a native log4j. It keeps JUL as API which also allows a

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > Le 5 sept. 2017 17:35, "Ralph Goers" > a écrit : > > > >

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

> On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le 5 sept. 2017 17:35, "Ralph Goers" > a écrit : > > >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: >> >>>

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

Le 5 sept. 2017 17:35, "Ralph Goers" a écrit : > On Sep 5, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > 2017-09-05 15:33 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers : >> >> I see your point. I guess we never built a bridge from the

[GitHub] commons-text issue #55: TEXT-97: RandomStringGenerator able to pass multiple...

Github user ameyjadiye commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/55 @chtompki , I'm sorry for such short note, 2.x was for making .builder() static, PR seems ok for accepting in 1.2 release, you might want to go though jira as well. ---

[GitHub] commons-text issue #55: TEXT-97: RandomStringGenerator able to pass multiple...

Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/55 Pardon...I don't see why this would necessitate a 2.X. Let me re-read. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] commons-text issue #55: TEXT-97: RandomStringGenerator able to pass multiple...

Github user chtompki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/55 Are we ready to do a change that would necessitate a 2.X? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

> On Sep 5, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > 2017-09-05 15:33 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers : >> >> I see your point. I guess we never built a bridge from the Log4j 2 API to >> JUL simply because we couldn’t imagine anyone would want to

Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

Hello Benedikt, How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? I will submit changes [1] related to this in fact i'm fixing couple of failing test cases ATM. If you are planning to release 3.6.1 just to remove deprecation and deprecate RandomStringUtils back in Lang - 3.7 I'm

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

The log4j-api to JUL bridge would be for users who have a JUL logging config already that don't want to change, but do want all code to log to the same location. On 5 September 2017 at 08:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2017-09-05 15:33 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers

[GitHub] commons-text issue #55: TEXT-97: RandomStringGenerator able to pass multiple...

Github user ameyjadiye commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/55 @chtompki , If possible can you review and accept this ? I need this for TEXT-101. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-05 15:33 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers : > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 12:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > 2017-09-05 9:01 GMT+02:00 Apache >: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

> On Sep 5, 2017, at 12:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > 2017-09-05 9:01 GMT+02:00 Apache >: > >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >>> On Sep 4, 2017, at 10:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Le 4/09/2017 à 15:30, Gilles a écrit : > I see it as a fundamental one: Why should codes unrelated > by scope be artificially tied together by management rules > (such as design, supported language version, release schedule, > etc.)?[1] Because they share the same general scope of being math

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

2017-09-05 9:01 GMT+02:00 Apache : > > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Sep 4, 2017, at 10:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > Le 5 sept. 2017 05:40, "Ralph Goers" a > écrit : > > > > > >> On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:24

Re: [JCS] update to Log4j 2 facade API

Sent from my iPad > On Sep 4, 2017, at 10:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le 5 sept. 2017 05:40, "Ralph Goers" a écrit : > > >> On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: >> >> Le 4 sept. 2017