Hello and possible addition

2018-01-01 Thread Otto Fowler
Hello Commons, My name is Otto Fowler ( ottobackwards on github, otto -AT- apache.org at apache ), and I’m a PMC member of the Apache Metron project. While working on adding some timing functionality to a Metron feature, I came across the Stopwatch

[parent] Release commons-parent 43

2018-01-01 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: Now that maven-site-plugin 3.7 is out and fixes building with Java 9, I propose we release it. Thoughts? Gary

Re: Linear Programming in Math Commons and Happy New Year

2018-01-01 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jan 1, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Bill Igoe wrote: > > Hi Gang, > > I noted a recent exchange on OLS regarding Math Commons. Thus far I find > the Math Commons working flawlessly. I am also working on a project for > pure real time financial optimization using the Linear

Linear Programming in Math Commons and Happy New Year

2018-01-01 Thread Bill Igoe
Hi Gang, I noted a recent exchange on OLS regarding Math Commons. Thus far I find the Math Commons working flawlessly. I am also working on a project for pure real time financial optimization using the Linear Programming algorithm of Math commons. I designed my code to flip between the QSOPT

Re: [beanutils] Moving to beanutils2

2018-01-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, > Am 30.12.2017 um 16:24 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Who can speak to that code base? I’ve worked on BeanUtils2 some years ago together with Simone Tripodi. I think we should better work on this redesign instead oh pushing the old code base as 2.0 just to fix some

Re: [collections] toward 4.2

2018-01-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, > Am 30.12.2017 um 20:07 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > On Dec 30, 2017 03:55, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > > Hi, > > +1! We should finally get COLLECTIONS-653 out of the door. > > > Do you mean that the Javado is Java-8-clean? No, the Java 9

Re: AW: [commons-lang3] NumberUtils feature

2018-01-01 Thread Lucas Carvalho
Hello Javen, Thanks for you reply, when i sended the code, i have writend quickly, however, if this feature i`ll be aproved, i will follow java / API convension. Ps. When I think in "between function", the first thing that comes in the head is SQL BETWEEN ... Obrigado. Atenciosamente Lucas

Re: AW: [commons-lang3] NumberUtils feature

2018-01-01 Thread Lucas Carvalho
Hi Gilles, When was thinking about this implementation, i was thinking in primitive types and Object (Integer, Double), but for Object, i think "Range" is ok to use. Thanks, Lucas On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:25:32

Re: AW: [commons-lang3] NumberUtils feature

2018-01-01 Thread Javen O'Neal
I'm -1 for a static function as suggested by Lucas. It doesn't improve code readability, and I'd argue that it decreases readability because of needing to memorize operator order, ambiguous inclusivity of endpoints (unless you add isStrictlyBetween), and doesn't gracefully handle mixed data types,