Re: [collections] CollectionUtils not null-safe

This protection concept sounds perfectly rational, until you think of other obvious things that do similar things to protect the coder. myLong.equals(myString) doesn't throw an exception for instance, it just return false. but then you never know that you have a problem in your code and just

Re: [maven-scm-api] Looking to perform svn remote move

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le vendredi 18 mai 2018, 22:36:20 CEST Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > On May 18, 2018, at 3:30 PM, Michael Osipov > wrote: > > > > > > Am 2018-05-17 um 15:12 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > > > > Hello

Re: [collections] CollectionUtils not null-safe

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 18 May 2018 at 20:34, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > A lot of methods in CollectionUtils are not null-safe and are documented > as > > such in Javadoc with throwing NPEs. > > > > I'd like to

[Numbers] More modules (Was: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math)

Hello Gimhana. On Thu, 17 May 2018 23:32:15 +0200, Gilles wrote: Hi Gimhana. On Fri, 18 May 2018 00:16:04 +0530, Gimhana Nadeeshan wrote: Hi all, We might want to create a public branch for that work in order to merge PRs more quickly without risk of breaking "master". What do you think?

Re: [ALL] SHA-1 vs. SHA-256

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 6:38 AM, ajs6f wrote: > > On May 19, 2018, at 5:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > On 18/05/2018 17:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> Thoughts? > > > > I wouldn't bother. The checksum is just there to ensure the download > worked

Re: [ALL] SHA-1 vs. SHA-256

> On May 19, 2018, at 5:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 18/05/2018 17:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Thoughts? > > I wouldn't bother. The checksum is just there to ensure the download worked > properly, and for this even md5 is fine. > > The authenticity of the artifacts is

Re: [collections] CollectionUtils not null-safe

On 18 May 2018 at 20:34, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > A lot of methods in CollectionUtils are not null-safe and are documented as > such in Javadoc with throwing NPEs. > > I'd like to change that. To what? > The change is behavioral and BC would be preserved. > >

Re: [ALL] SHA-1 vs. SHA-256

On 18/05/2018 17:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thoughts? I wouldn't bother. The checksum is just there to ensure the download worked properly, and for this even md5 is fine. The authenticity of the artifacts is ensured by the GPG signatures. Emmanuel Bourg