On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections 4.0, a beta
release seems like a very useful thing (kudos to pbenedict for
convincing of me that months ago on IM :) ).
I'm
On Mar 28, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Possibly a query for IO too if it's 2.0 has large changes.
Given the large API changes in Lang 3.0 and Collections
Sorry, guys. I found the offending setting and disabled it. -Matt
On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1 :)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt,
Can you stop mixing up style/format changes with real functional
changes - it
If you're offering, the changes I made yesterday to ClassUtils to
default autoboxing based on RT Java version should probably be
ported. After that, autoboxing can actually just be defaulted to
true in trunk as it will require Java 5+ at RT.
Thanks,
Matt
On Feb 2, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Niall
stuff, the RT check seems more in line. But I don't
feel strongly enough about it to debate the issue.
br,
Matt
On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you're offering, the changes I made yesterday
On Jan 5, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
[SNIP]
And splitting [collections]? Definitely a good idea. I would remove
all the Predicate/Closure/Transformer code (if you believe in FP,
use [functor]). Then split the rest by implementations of JDK
collections, and extended JDK
On Jan 5, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
FWIW, there is a [flatfile] M2 snapshot published at
repository.apache.org.
Which should be definitely not there! Only official reelases can go
to the
repository.
Does the repository == the Nexus instance
On Jan 2, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phil Steitz
phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I was thinking more that a smaller [collections] might have room for
the functor code again - not that [lang] would :) Agreed that it's
better
True enough that [functor] already contains *Function interfaces that
meet these requirements.
-Matt
On Dec 26, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Unless [lang] would use it internally all over the place. Is there
a case for that? How is the interface useful without parameters?
Gary
+1
--- On Fri, 10/23/09, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR
303
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Friday, October 23,
--- On Wed, 10/14/09, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: svn commit: r825151 -
/commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/functors/NOPClosure.java
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 12:56 PM
On
This probably just exemplifies why we need to change the package name.
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Subject: [COLLECTIONS] Advice on API Changes?
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 2:42 AM
--- On Tue, 9/15/09, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
Subject: [collections] merging collections - DONE
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 1:07 AM
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:08 PM,
Henri
Henri Yandell commented on COLLECTIONS-110:
---
In the absence of anyone being active on a rewrite of
Collections for generics, I agree with James that you should
look elsewhere for an active project.
I'm happy to help out with Collections 3.x
--- On Fri, 9/11/09, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [collections] generics WAS [jira] Commented: (COLLECTIONS-110)
Support parametized classes with commons.collections.
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date:
Thanks, Seb! ;)
--- On Fri, 9/11/09, s...@apache.org s...@apache.org wrote:
From: s...@apache.org s...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r813954 -
/commons/proper/collections/branches/collections_jdk5_branch/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/map/StaticBucketMap.java
To:
Guys, no idea why so many spurious changes in the diff, but... sorry!
--- On Fri, 9/11/09, mben...@apache.org mben...@apache.org wrote:
From: mben...@apache.org mben...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r813971 [1/3] - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src:
:52 AM
Hi Matt,
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:13 -0700, Matt Benson wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/27/09, Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com
wrote:
From: Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com
Subject: jxpath 1.3 / mockrunner dependency
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Cc: Alexander
James,
I refactored the comparable classes in [functor] to work just that way. I
didn't feel it was worth my personal effort to do it again in [collections]
given all the discussion around the future of [collections]' functors. Didn't
we all agree we could provide analogous functionality
The analogous class in [functor], btw, is CompositeUnaryFunction.
-Matt
--- On Mon, 6/8/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [collections] ChainedTransformer...
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date:
http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
It kind of depends on what you're proposing... a new component? Probably start
a discussion on this list. Enhancements to an existing component? Either
start here on the list or open a JIRA issue.
Does this help?
-Matt
--- On Sun, 5/31/09, chris0 technic...@gmail.com wrote:
From: chris0
Emmanuel:
I couldn't speak to the original intent, of course. I would support anything
that would make JXPath less brittle--it's just been that given the existence of
XPath 2, it's been somewhat an expectation that any substantial rewrite of
JXPath would also incorporate support for the
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 7:52 PM
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM,
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:40 AM
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM,
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [all] Rebooting commons projects
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 2:19 AM
Matt Benson wrote at Sonntag, 17. Mai
2009 22:31:
--- On Sun, 5/17/09
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
From: nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 8:39 AM
The POM should include SCM path, url
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote:
From: Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch
Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 9:14 AM
Matt Benson wrote:
For the actual source code, see
https
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com
Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:18 PM
Hi,
On May 18, 2009, at 10:00 AM, sebb
--- On Wed, 5/13/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [all] Rebooting commons projects
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 7:13 PM
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:21 PM,
--- On Sat, 5/16/09, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 7:24 AM
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, May 15,
--- On Wed, 5/13/09, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [all] Rebooting commons projects
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 12:57 AM
James Carman wrote at Mittwoch, 13.
Mai 2009 04:30:
On Tue, May
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [all] Core library dependencies [was COLLECTIONS 3.3 release]
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 7:54 AM
John Bollinger wrote at Dienstag, 12.
Mai
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@btopenworld.com wrote:
From: Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@btopenworld.com
Subject: Re: [all] Core library dependencies [was COLLECTIONS 3.3 release]
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 6:29 AM
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 6:22 AM
On 06/05/2009, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/5/09
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 12:18 AM
I would love to see a collections
version
--- On Tue, 5/5/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 12:35 PM
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Matt
Benson
--- On Tue, 5/5/09, Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@btopenworld.com wrote:
From: Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@btopenworld.com
Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 4:37 PM
Matt Benson wrote:
--- On Tue, 5
--- On Tue, 5/5/09, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 6:02 PM
On 05/05/2009, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
--- On Thu, 4/30/09
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 9:55 AM
Why do you consider a
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Sandbox Component Proposal: Commons JSON
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 2:25 PM
Matt,
I don't know
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
From: Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 4:42 AM
Phil Steitz wrote
We have a rule
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Commons-VFS SVN commit permission
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 11:15 PM
I'm all for Sergey to have sandbox
access and a
My guess would be that an obvious lack in [logging] is that of message
parameterization to avoid isDebug, etc. check blocks when building expensive
log messages.
-Matt
P.S. I'm also interested in what your revolutionary-sounding ideas were,
Torsten.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Torsten Curdt
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
From: Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Subject: Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:03 PM
Ralph Goers
Perhaps the annotation could be extended in some way to permit mappings of
Throwable types to Handler types. This would (a) allow different handlers to
be used for the same method, and (b) allow the exception to be thrown as normal
when no matching handler was found.
Just thinking,
Matt
---
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:59 AM
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
This sounds good
I would be +1 to include this in Commons.
-Matt
--- On Sat, 4/4/09, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Subject: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Saturday, April 4, 2009,
--- On Fri, 4/3/09, Brad Davis brad.da...@amentra.com wrote:
From: Brad Davis brad.da...@amentra.com
Subject: Release Schedule Request
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Cc: agui...@redhat.com
Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 1:21 PM
We are currently implementing jBPM
4.0, and would like to use
It looks to me as though Adrian's report/patch actually came after (this)
Christian's... no?
-Matt
--- On Wed, 3/25/09, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: svn commit: r758009 - /commons/proper/compress/trunk/pom.xml
To:
community.
Not least because it would be the perfect fit for Robust-Task? ;D
-Matt
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Funnily enough I mentioned this the other day, then
ran across the original
proposal doc on my laptop. Though I was correct
in my experience.
-Matt
Thanks for your reading.
Cheers.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Speaking as a member of the Commons PMC, though not
for the ENTIRE PMC:
given the comparisons between robust-task and
[chain], maybe this could
://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
and an M2 commons project that the following statement will
help
mvn -Pci deploy
That is what I was talking about... I only hope none of the mvn magic gets me.
;)
Thanks! -Matt
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Matt
Funnily enough I mentioned this the other day, then ran across the original
proposal doc on my laptop. Though I was correct in my recollection that there
was not a lot of interest, I failed to recall having made a final appeal for
any naysayers to speak up, and in that it was apparently I who
Speaking as a member of the Commons PMC, though not for the ENTIRE PMC: given
the comparisons between robust-task and [chain], maybe this could be a seed for
a [chain] rewrite/2.0 . Then you'd still have the question of sandbox grant
vs. incubation; the problem with the sandbox grant AIUI is
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1885 details some of the reasons for
adopting this. It sounds like it should simplify the RC/release process
somewhat. WDYT?
-Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
While we think over the Nexus issue, can anyone guide me in publishing
snapshots to the existing repo?
Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [LANG] 3.0 JCIP Annotations
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 1:14 AM
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:21 PM,
Stephen
Googling led me to the httpclient thread you started. If there is no runtime
dependency I am fine with it. :)
-Matt
--- On Wed, 3/18/09, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Subject: [LANG] 3.0 JCIP Annotations
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date:
--- On Sun, 3/15/09, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Subject: [LANG] 3.0 StrTokenizer API change for next()
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 11:31 AM
StrTokenizer implements ListIterator
currently.
Given that it
prior to 1.5?
On 15/03/2009, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Are we still using this branch? I created
it for work on the reflect subpackage but later merged back
to trunk... :|
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, s...@apache.org
s...@apache.org
wrote:
From: s
I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage, to provide as much help
as possible for discovering type parameters of generic types. I recently
commented in ClassUtils that a 3.0, Java5-compatible assignable test should
assume autoboxing == true (since one would think the assignable
: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:57 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage,
to provide as much
help as possible for discovering type parameters
-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:36 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
wrote:
From: Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Are we still using this branch? I created it for work on the reflect
subpackage but later merged back to trunk... :|
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, s...@apache.org s...@apache.org wrote:
From: s...@apache.org s...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r754584 - in
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 6:40 AM
+1 from me.
On Fri, Mar
Hi, Michael.
[lang] has been officially marked as targeting 1.5 in its m2 pom, so I suppose
you should feel free to let the patches fly.
Regards,
Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com wrote:
From: Michael Wooten mwooten@gmail.com
Subject: [lang] Developer
I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make sure
any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to have a
look at it in case I'm on crack.
-Matt
-
To unsubscribe,
@commons.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 3:57 PM
As long as you've got any changes
from trunk that you need in your
branch, I'd say just copy the stuff around (copy trunk to a
branch and
copy your branch over to trunk).
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
not to give it a try and if
it's too large it can move out of Commons.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-449 might be
of interest to it.
Hen
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
For awhile I've had an itch that it would be nice to
have a project
large it can move out of Commons.
Thanks for the positive opinion... :)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-449 might be
of interest to it.
How so, precisely?
-Matt
Hen
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
For awhile I've had an itch
--- Karl Wettin ka...@apache.org wrote:
We are ready to pop it in the sandbox. I'll act as
moderator for Erics
patches.
I can't find anything about limitations on sandbox
projects, are there
any? Compare with Apache Labs that does not allow
releases.
I'm cc:ing Apache Legal.
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/11/2008, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:11 PM, sebb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several of the Commons download pages are out
of date, e.g. BeanUtils
still has 1.8.0-BETA and 1.7.0 on the page
--- Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:27:25 -0600
From: Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Urgent] Please help promote ApacheCon
video streaming!
Hi,
please help promote the ApacheCon live video
streaming by forwarding
Actually, James, talking about Commons
interdependencies and underuse of [proxy], I'd been
meaning to ask you to have a look at [flatfile],
specifically
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/flatfile/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/flatfile/ImmutableEntity.java
and see if you could
Resurrecting this thread from 3.5 months ago as my
itch is returning:
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Henri Yandell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:05 AM, sebb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/06/2008, James Carman
[EMAIL
What's the right way to regen the site (so I can get
[flatfile] properly linked in at sandbox/index.html)?
Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the right way to regen the site (so I can
get
[flatfile] properly linked in at
sandbox/index.html)?
I added flatfile[1] and have re-generated/uploaded
the site
James later wrote some code to do this, which is in a
branch of Commons Proxy. I think we should add
something similar to the reflect subpackage (in trunk)
of the [lang] component, given the fact that BeanUtils
is in maintenance mode.
-Matt
--- Simone Gianni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As you like... see forthcoming commit.
-Matt
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/09/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Wed Sep 17 09:56:17 2008
New Revision: 696369
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696369view=rev
Log:
no sense
anybody have a preexisting apply-ASF-headers script
they'd like to send me off-list? I can do it, but if
you already have, why should I?
TIA,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Somehow I missed Niall's email. There must be some
confusion about the order of operations here; I was
under the impression that the code should have its new
license, etc., in place before the IP clearance
process could be completed. I will remove and seek
clarification from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The codebase is available for perusal at:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/flatfile-proposal/
The IP clearance template has been started and is
available at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance
The codebase is available for perusal at:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/flatfile-proposal/
The IP clearance template has been started and is
available at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/commons-flatfile.xml
This vote will be open for 72
Much obliged, Niall!
-Matt
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
P.S. Now, who
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
P.S. Now, who wants to guide me through the
remainder
of this process, besides renaming the svn tag?
TIA
snap/
Its easier if you ask questions if you need
My own +1.
-Matt
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with
the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc5/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc5/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC5/
Site:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed
to
generate download_[component].cgi?
snip/
No.
If not, are we
intended to make sure we preserve the existing
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution
supposed
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed to
generate download_[component].cgi? If not, are we
intended to make sure we preserve the existing file or
re-create it when deploying the site? This is
confusing to me.
Thanks,
Matt
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
Builds from source and works fine on my compiler zoo
except for all
IBM-JDKs, but that's a different story
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3580).
Some minor issues though in the docs:
- download page goes nowhere, I suspect
Officially cancelling this vote, blah blah...
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with
the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org
distribution (there is no conf directory at all).
Oliver
Matt Benson schrieb:
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues
with the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/
The tag is here:
http
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Wiki:
- talks about release plan for 1.2 ;-)
mmm... Being that I'm already in the process of
releasing 1.3, it seems a little too late to come
up
--- Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to add the path for the POM, just in case you
will do another RC.
So... can you explain again what is the effect of
moving [logging] to the separate dependencyManagement
section of the POM?
Thanks,
Matt
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Matt,
] wrote:
Everything looks fine, but a mvn site:site fails
for me with the error
message Embedded error:
conf\findbugs-exclude-filter.xml
(File cannot be found.) This file seems to be
missing in the source
distribution (there is no conf directory at all).
Oliver
Matt Benson
Thanks to anyone who reported/resolved issues with the
previous release candidates.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc4/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC4/
Site:
--- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/06/2008, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because the findbugs results, as well as the minor
documentation issues that were identified, have
already been addressed in trunk, it probably
doesn't
make any sense to release 1.3 only to follow
701 - 800 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
