On 5 March 2013 19:57, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Just for the record: I don't intend to do a major rewrite ATM, just
update and bugfix.
So why the change to 2.0?
I intend to add at least generics, where possible - in the past, the
introduction of generics in digester
On 5 March 2013 20:56, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks both Gary and Sebb,
It seems very unlikely that anyone will still be running Java 1.3 or
Java 1.4, so the change to 1.5 is not likely to concern users, even
though it is a bit of a jump.
Is the addition of generics
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
These nested if statements could be combined should be resolved, but
the rest I don't
On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation?
Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old
methods.
e.g.
@Deprecated
public int getContentLength() { ... }
/**
* @since
One way to do this is to add SVN tag markers - Eclipse then shows
these in the SVN History list.
On 6 March 2013 09:20, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
A dummy search on changes-report[1] doesn't show up anything useful -
I'll dig later after some work is already done
danke
for the Maven plugin, but I've
never used it).
On 6 March 2013 09:40, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
One way to do this is to add SVN tag markers - Eclipse then shows
these in the SVN History list.
On 6 March 2013 09:20, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
A dummy search on changes
Same applies to the FileItemHeadersImpl class.
On 6 March 2013 09:57, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've added some tags.
Looks like the files were added in 1.2.1; this was in r523066
I expect it was intended that the next release would be 1.3, but for
some reason a point release was made
I fixed the 3 @since 1.3 markers.
On 6 March 2013 09:57, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've added some tags.
Looks like the files were added in 1.2.1; this was in r523066
I expect it was intended that the next release would be 1.3, but for
some reason a point release was made.
Normally
On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I have recently learned that changing the required Java version for a
component does not necessarily affect binary compartibility [1].
I'm thinking about updating [BeanUtils] to Java 1.5. We would have the
following
On 6 March 2013 11:51, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/3/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation?
Create new methods which return long rather than int
On 5 March 2013 22:28, Lawrence Angrave angr...@illinois.edu wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback.
Some comments that are relevant to Apache3 UnicodeEscaper and Apache2's
StringEscapeUtils.java
Summary-
* I noticed the current Apache code creates three String objects each
time it
There are yet more broken links on the commons site for all components.
Most of the stuff below Project Reports is broken; the only links
that aren't are the external ones, i.e. those that don't point to
commons.apache.org.
This is presumably because the components are now under proper/ rather
On 6 March 2013 16:30, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are yet more broken links on the commons site for all components.
Most of the stuff below Project Reports is broken; the only links
that aren't are the external ones, i.e. those that don't point to
commons.apache.org
OK by me
On 7 March 2013 11:29, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
thoughts? :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Simone Tripodi
Remember there is a -Ptest-deploy profile that can be used to test
what will be deployed.
This puts the output in target/deploy
I've found it's sometimes necessary to use package as well as
deploy to ensure everything is included in the deploy phase.
On 7 March 2013 11:36, Thomas Neidhart
OK by me.
On 7 March 2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
On 7 March 2013 12:33, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
OK to change Checkstyle/PMD to eliminate warnings.
But I would avoid rewrapping to the new line length unless it's
obviously easier to read.
On 7 March 2013 15:05, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 15:05:17 2013
New Revision: 1453909
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453909
Log:
checkstyle: PackageHtml module no longer needed, package documentation moved
from package.html to package-info.java
On 7 March 2013 12:52, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 12:52:04 2013
New Revision: 1453831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453831
Log:
checkstyle: Avoid inline conditionals.
I think Checkstyle is wrong in this case.
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
If so, that would surely satisfy the
On 7 March 2013 16:16, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the release
On 7 March 2013 18:36, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 18:36:15 2013
New Revision: 1453990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453990
Log:
Fix first step in release howto.
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/doc/release/release.howto.txt
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 19:29, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 19:29:41 2013
New Revision: 1454037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454037
Log:
Exclude download cgi from source distribution.
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/assembly/src.xml
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 19:52, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 19:52:39 2013
New Revision: 1454057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454057
Log:
releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in
On 8 March 2013 06:52, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in parent, or
does it have a different function?
If so, it should have a different name.
to be merged in the
On 8 March 2013 13:06, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. So it looks like Gump is set up for Maven:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/commons-fileupload/
That was from an earlier run using Ant.
The Maven config has yet to be tested;
On 8 March 2013 07:31, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/08/2013 01:25 AM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2
On 8 March 2013 20:28, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 March 2013 07:31, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/08/2013 01:25 AM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the requested change is made then all should be fine with the world again
On 9 March 2013 11:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified
On 9 March 2013 14:31, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/09/2013 03:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The user proposed a solution - without a patch - that, in his opinion,
should work.
We do not have a testcase which proves the reported issue, which would
affect
On 10 March 2013 15:53, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote:
As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for
DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes,
so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-)
A few issues I'm running into:
On 11 March 2013 08:33, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 11/03/2013 08:51, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Le 11/03/2013 00:47, sebb a écrit :
On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc
On 11 March 2013 06:10, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Mon Mar 11 06:10:51 2013
New Revision: 1455005
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1455005
Log:
Tagging first RC for Compress 1.5
Please don't recreate a tag with the same name.
If you need to re-roll, choose the next RC
On 11 March 2013 08:57, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
[took me a few days longer since I wanted to incorporate fixes for the
two issues that popped up last week. So here we go.]
With 30 JIRA issues fixed it is about time to cut a new release of
Commons Compress.
On 11 March 2013 21:18, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello Stefan,
2013/3/11 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Hi all,
[took me a few days longer since I wanted to incorporate fixes for the
two issues that popped up last week. So here we go.]
With 30 JIRA issues fixed it is
The DOAP files are currently held under
/commons/proper/component/trunk/doap_component.rdf
This is sort of convenient for editting, but means the doap file gets
included in tags and branches and may get included in source.
If included in source, the release date may be missing or inaccurate.
/doap_fileupload.rdf
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The DOAP files are currently held under
/commons/proper/component/trunk
On 12 March 2013 09:05, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Tue Mar 12 09:05:06 2013
New Revision: 1455456
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1455456
Log:
trivial: extracted POST string constant
Modified:
On 12 March 2013 11:17, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2013, at 7:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have voted -1 on the RC, because the tag would not agree with
the source archive.
However, releases cannot be vetoed.
In which case, vetoing the commit
On 12 March 2013 09:23, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW it all happens in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/commons-proper.xml
If I understand that correctly, the Gump build is already
:
Changed: sebb @ Tue 12 Mar 2013 17:08:43 +
Comment: Document use of default charset
Files changed:
/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/FileUploadBase.java
( 1455626
On 15 March 2013 17:48, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 15/03/2013 16:42, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 3/15/13 8:11 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 15/03/2013 15:20, Continuum@vmbuild a écrit :
Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
On 15 March 2013 10:37, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Fri Mar 15 10:37:01 2013
New Revision: 1456871
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1456871
Log:
checkstyle: '256' is a magic number.
Modified:
On 15 March 2013 10:11, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Fri Mar 15 10:11:09 2013
New Revision: 1456857
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1456857
Log:
checkstyle: '4' is a magic number.
Modified:
See other comments on magic number fixes.
I don't think these changes achieve anything apart from keeping
Checkstyle happy.
IMO the number is still magic (unexplained) when it is turned into a
constant, and it seems stilly to have a constant that is only used
once.
On 15 March 2013 10:02,
On 15 March 2013 08:47, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Fri Mar 15 08:47:53 2013
New Revision: 1456804
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1456804
Log:
checkstyle: Expected @throws tag
Modified:
On 17 March 2013 06:51, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Sun Mar 17 06:51:22 2013
New Revision: 1457387
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457387
Log:
xdocs doesn't know a subsubsection
Modified:
commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/releases/prepare.xml
Modified:
On 17 March 2013 13:18, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
/**
+ * the decoding table size.
+ */
+private static final int DECODING_TABLE_SIZE = 256;
+
The Javadoc does not say why the value 256 is used, so the number is
still a magic number ...
What should
I temporarily changed the (shared) build definition to use Build Fresh
rather than SCM update and triggered a build.
I've reverted to change to the build definition.
Continuum ought to have an easier way to do this ...
On 17 March 2013 13:37, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi all,
On 17 March 2013 20:02, Bill Speirs bill.spe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have worked on some significant enhancements to commons-dbutils, so I
would like to release 2.0.
*Note: This is backwards incompatible change with the 1.x versions. As such
I've changed the maven
coordinates and package
On 17 March 2013 19:43, wspe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wspeirs
Date: Sun Mar 17 19:43:06 2013
New Revision: 1457541
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457541
Log:
- Setting to RC1
Modified:
commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_2_0_RC1/pom.xml
Tags are supposed to be immutable.
If you
On 15 March 2013 16:20, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Fri Mar 15 16:20:27 2013
New Revision: 1457003
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457003
Log:
checkstyle: magic numbers
-1
Although these changes don't affect the code, they are wrong.
Just because the same
On 18 March 2013 08:46, Sebb (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13604945#comment-13604945
]
Sebb commented on DIGESTER-171
On 17 March 2013 11:02, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
See other comments on magic number fixes.
I don't think these changes achieve anything apart from keeping
Checkstyle happy.
IMO the number is still magic (unexplained) when it is turned into a
constant, and it seems stilly to have
On 17 March 2013 13:19, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
/**
+ * The default number of byte shift for decode.
[Actually, it's not a default - the value is fixed, and cannot be
changed without breaking the code.]
+ */
+private static final int OUT_SHIFT = 4;
+
On 18 March 2013 09:17, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Simone Tripodi wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:51 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 18 March 2013 08:56, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-03-17, sebb wrote:
a name=Manual Methodh4Manual Method/h4/a
Surely names are normally lower-case only and no spaces?
I think spaces make the links look odd (and awkward to type).
Uses the same syntax as the mvn
The new utils.mime classes for MIME decoding are mostly package-protected.
However, they have public methods (and ctors) which is a bit misleading.
I think it would make sense to reduce the visibility to package protected.
Any objections?
On 18 March 2013 10:07, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/3/18 sebb seb...@gmail.com
The new utils.mime classes for MIME decoding are mostly package-protected.
However, they have public methods (and ctors) which is a bit misleading.
I think it would make sense to reduce
On 18 March 2013 09:58, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18 March 2013 09:17, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
[snip]
Actually, for my own projects I always add
@since upcoming
or
@deprecated As of upcoming ...
When I prepare
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2013 16:20, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Fri Mar 15 16:20:27
On 18 March 2013 13:14, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
With 3 binding +1 votes (Luc, Gary and Mladen) and no
other votes I declare this vote as passed.
I'll copy the artefacts and create ANN message after mirrors pick up
the release (within 24 hrs).
Please also add the files to the SVN
On 18 March 2013 20:31, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
but there are too many discussions about checkstyle rules and perfect
releases. We should aim to follow more the open-source credo: release
early, release often, imho.
I 150% agree with you mate - it's pity here we
On 18 March 2013 14:56, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Mon Mar 18 14:56:34 2013
New Revision: 1457788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457788
Log:
[FILEUPLOAD-232] started importing MimeUtility test case from
On 14 March 2013 08:25, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
The vote has passed with +1s by Gary, Sebb, Benedict, Jörg and myself
(which I didn't cast expplicitly, sorry) - four of which are binding.
I'll promote the staging and copy over the tarballs now. I'll update
the site and send
at introducing function-specific constants shortly.
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 March 2013 10:45, Simone Tripodi
On 18 March 2013 18:45, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon Mar 18 18:45:56 2013
New Revision: 1457915
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457915
Log:
Fix Javadoc.
Modified:
On 18 March 2013 17:16, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon Mar 18 17:16:42 2013
New Revision: 1457876
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1457876
Log:
Use final for read-only local variables.
Modified:
Thanks!
On 18 March 2013 21:43, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed: Committed revision 1458025.
G
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
Very odd indeed, I'll need to fix...
Gary
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm... I consider this a bug in checkstyle or whatever does the
complaining...
Gary
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 March 2013 18:45, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon Mar 18 18:45:56 2013
New
It's all getting a bit unnecessary here.
My comment was about a new file; I did not see the point of including
properties that are not going to be used.
I did not veto the commit; it was just an observation.
Having said that, if the properties are set it might suggest that they
can be used.
But
.
On 19 March 2013 05:54, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/18/2013 10:00 PM, sebb wrote:
On 18 March 2013 13:14, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
With 3 binding +1 votes (Luc, Gary and Mladen) and no
other votes I declare this vote as passed.
I'll copy the artefacts and create ANN
On 19 March 2013 14:44, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
is there anything you want to discuss before I go ahead with a new RC?
I am performing some ITs in non-public projects and I planned to cut a
new RC in 1-2 days...
I think there are still some issues in
Commons is currently still publishing mon-Maven releases from
people.a.o dist/commons.
There is an outstanding JIRA issue for this to be changed to svnpubsub:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5929
Until this is implemented, it is vital that the dist SVN and people
directories are
On 19 March 2013 18:27, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi there,
is there anything you want to discuss before I go ahead with a new RC?
I am performing some ITs in non-public projects and I planned to cut a
new RC in 1-2 days...
I think there are still some issues in
On 19 March 2013 18:32, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, why not depend on commons-codec?
Codec is nearly 4 times the size of file upload.
Not an ideal partner.
Gary
On Mar 19, 2013, at 14:28, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi there,
is there anything you
On 19 March 2013 18:38, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
How do you feel about postponing some of the improvement tickets until
after the initial release? Is this possible with commons release policy or
do we have to resolve all open issues?
As far as I'm concerned, Improvement
in this implementation there's always the need to
decode the whole buffer
r1458240 | sebb | 2013-03-19 13:18:39 +0100 (Tue, 19 Mar 2013) | 3 lines
FILEUPLOAD-233 Base64Decoder doesn't correctly implement RFC 4648
Oops
On 19 March 2013 18:48, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
How many gigs of ram do phone that run Java have these days?
Some not a lot, see for example:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-221
Gary
On Mar 19, 2013, at 14:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2013
-1 if this results in a huge increase in size of the jar.
If shading can extract only the required classes, that might be OK,
but it seems like a lot of work when the code already works for valid
input.
I think the only outstanding problems are the way the decoders handle
invalid input.
On 19
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 if this results in a huge increase in size of the jar.
If shading can extract only the required classes, that might be OK,
but it seems like a lot of work when the code already works for valid
input.
I think the only outstanding
On 19 March 2013 19:16, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2013 18:52, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
3 commits? :O
This one, and:
r1458269
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-commits/201303.mbox/%3C20130319132232.8ABD023888EA%40eris.apache.org%3E
On 19 March 2013 20:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 18.03.2013 11:19, schrieb sebb:
On 18 March 2013 10:07, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/3/18 sebb seb...@gmail.com
The new utils.mime classes for MIME decoding are mostly
package-protected.
However
Turns out the problem was caused by a NUL in the string in
decodeWithInnerPad() - diff then treats the file as binary.
Replaced with \0 for now.
On 19 March 2013 20:02, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2013 19:16, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2013 18:52, Simone Tripodi
) but maybe it would be better to only allow 1 or 2 PADs at the
end?
On 19 March 2013 19:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There's one other issue - Commons Codec does not support soft line
breaks in quoted printable decoding.
As far as I know, those are required.
On 19 March 2013 19:46, Matt
On 20 March 2013 08:26, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
priceless!!!
At present it treats an embedded PAD as the end of input (as per
Codec) but maybe it would be better to only allow 1 or 2 PADs at the
end?
IMHO having such behaviour is acceptable, but if it doesn't cost you
On 20 March 2013 14:42, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/03/2013 01:09, sebb wrote:
I think QPD(ecode) is now OK; it handles lowercase hex and rejects
invalid characters.
Base64Decode handles valid
On 20 March 2013 19:46, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All:
It seems to be that the B64 code needs work for 1.3 no matter what. So I am
not sure I agree with Simo because:
- We rework B64 for 1.3 as proposed by Sebb.
It's not really rework - just tidying up the new code so
On 20 March 2013 20:05, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
commons-logging-1.1.2.
Please ensure you upload the release to the SVN dist release area ASAP
or it may get lost when svnpubsub is implemented by
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 March 2013 13:53, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we move to the AdminGroups with this wiki too?
I think yes
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki
On 20 March 2013 18:22, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 March 2013 14:42, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/03/2013 01:09, sebb wrote:
I think QPD(ecode) is now OK; it handles lowercase hex and rejects
On 21 March 2013 18:47, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Thu Mar 21 18:47:40 2013
New Revision: 1459447
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1459447
Log:
Javadoc.
Modified:
commons/proper/csv/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVFormat.java
On 22 March 2013 07:37, bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Fri Mar 22 07:37:03 2013
New Revision: 1459653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1459653
Log:
Fixing urls to point to new oracle pages and not old, sometimes broken, sun
urls
We should not have to do this, but given that
On 19 March 2013 17:05, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons is currently still publishing mon-Maven releases from
people.a.o dist/commons.
There is an outstanding JIRA issue for this to be changed to svnpubsub:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5929
Until this is implemented
On 22 March 2013 14:24, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2013 13:16, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-03-22, sebb wrote:
On 19 March 2013 17:05, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Commons
to fix the redirects.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Fri Mar 22 17:49:27 2013
New Revision: 1459912
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1459912
Log:
Fix up URLs so they point to actual sites; this allows relative URLs to
work properly
Modified
On 23 March 2013 00:19, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 22 March 2013 19:58, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I published the CSV site after your commit, but some links are still
incorrect, for example:
https://commons.apache.org/proper/releases/index.html
501 - 600 of 5923 matches
Mail list logo
