What’s the minimum target jre? If 8 or later, use java.util.BiConsumer.
Otherwise, create a custom @FunctionalInterface.
Chas
> On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
> wrote:
>
> Great catch indeed Gilles.
>
>
> So perhaps just leave the deprecated, with no replacement? And
Read Bloch. Don’t optimize until you have proven that this bit of code is
causing a significant performance hit.
arrayCopy can and is inlined by jit.
Chas
> On Feb 16, 2018, at 5:53 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
> String is still a type of Object (requiring GC handling
Definitely create interfaces.
Chas
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
>> pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
Profile triggers in src/profiles?
Chas
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 4:27 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 8 January 2018 at 23:14, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Am Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:48:08 + schrieb sebb:
>>
>>> On 8 January 2018 at 00:25, Jörg Schaible
+1 to Jorge ‘s comments
Chas
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 3:05 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Unlike components, there's no harm releasing CP as its usage is under
> our control.
> If it turns out there is a problem with CP 43, then we can just ignore it.
>
>> On 2 January 2018 at
I also have one of these.
+1
Chas
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 7:34 AM, Roger Whitcomb wrote:
>
> I have a class almost identical to this in my project, so +1 to this idea.
>
> ~Roger Whitcomb
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory
Take a look at how the maven team votes and publishes
Chas
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 8:26 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2017 9:32 PM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Nov 11, 2017, at 10:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
You can use dependency:analyze to find used and undeclared or unused and
declared dependencies. Perhaps we should add dependency:analyze-only to
release profile of parent pom to make sure dependencies are clean.
Chas
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Jacoco code coverage does runtime instrumentation, so this would not happen
with Jacoco profile.
Chas
> On Oct 15, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> Am 14.10.2017 um 14:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we have
Since most of us work in an IDE, the "wasted" time of checkstyle for every
build is negligible. At my day job, all code is automatically reformatted as
part of the build. It's just another step along with PMD, CPD, findbugs, sonar,
jacoco, junit, and a few other static analyses. The more we
+1 to close all
Chas
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Le 19/04/2017 à 18:00, Pascal Schumacher a écrit :
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I agree for LANG-1065, this case is covered by the Java 8 API. The
> improvements suggested in the other issues
Not sufficiently useful to include in commons.
Chas
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 1:31 PM, Bhowmik, Bindul wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:55 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 21 February 2017 at 12:40, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
On Feb
There was an update in parent to prevent excess jars from being attached as
artifacts.
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/view=revision=1755904
I don't believe it's been released.
Chas
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> Thanks for repying, but that
No votes. Will work on release tonight.
Chas
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 9:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Has this vote been tabulated?
>
> Gary
>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Charles Honton wrote:
>>
>> We have added a significant enhancements
Congratulations!
Chas
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> This vote passes (am I dreaming? ;-) The following votes were cast:
>
> Oliver Heger: +1 (binding)
> Gary Gregory: +1 (binding)
> Mark Roberts: +1
> Oliver Lamy: +1 (binding)
> Jörg Schaible:
The line number makes it look like the Parameterized values are not being
properly set by junit. Is it possible that we're using a new parent Pom that
doesn't fully configure junit plugin version? What version of maven are you
using?
I just successfully built from tip on a Mac using maven
Using the list from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Areas_of_mathematics, the
current commons math appears to be a sub-set of numerical analysis algorithms.
Is this correct? Will this continue be the focus of a math tlp?
Unfortunately, Apache Numerical Analysis does not trip off the tongue.
Will work in this evening. (GMT-8).
Chas
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 2:07 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> PING
>
> I am -1 on the commit as it stands; please revert or fix
>
>> On 28 August 2015 at 01:43, sebb wrote:
>>> On 12 August 2015 at 07:32,
I've created a pull request for a major refactor of how InstructionList and
InstructionHandle work. Please review the contents of
https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/2.
Thanks,
Chas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Benedikt,
Please take a look at mr pull request for FastDateParser.
Thanks,
Chas
On Jun 26, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
we have a lot of good new stuff, so I'm planning to review pending issues
over the next weeks and push out the next release until
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #96
commit 94faa31bcf5c4fcb20818a3a0d23ae789932d2df
Author: Chas Honton c...@apache.org
Date: 2015-06-12T03:07:13Z
refactor FastDateParser
use hashmap for performance
break down regular expressions to per
I will work on this weekend.
Regards,
Chas
On May 1, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello Charles,
it looks like your latest fixes have caused a regression (but only on JDK
6?!) [1]. Do you have time to have a look? Thank you so much for working on
the time
Duncan,
Nothing lost by moving into separate test class. Speed gained.
Chas
On Apr 11, 2015, at 12:02 AM, Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Lang takes a few minutes to build on my system, so I was examining
execution times of tests to see if anything can be
Benedikt,
Expletive, I wasn't being careful. The changes to FieldUtilsTest are to allow
test to pass under jacoco coverage.
I will revert, add another JIRA, fix changed.xml, and split into two commits
tonight.
Chas
On Apr 6, 2015, at 11:29 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
I have changes which will get tests to pass. Any preference to whether they
should be added to 3.4 or 3.5?
Chas
On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:01 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2015-04-04 10:57 GMT+02:00 Duncan Jones djo...@apache.org:
+0 (non-binding)
Built from zipped sources,
25 matches
Mail list logo