Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+1 On 03/07/16 16:12, Gilles wrote: Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/xisnvgq7f5w7c6o2 +1 Gilles Sadowski Artem Barger Rob Tompkins Venkatesha Murthy +0 Benedikt Ritter Stian Soiland-Reyes Feel free to fill in any missing names. People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-)

[RESULT][VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/xisnvgq7f5w7c6o2 +1 Gilles Sadowski Artem Barger Rob Tompkins Venkatesha Murthy +0 Benedikt Ritter Stian Soiland-Reyes Feel free to fill in any missing names. People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-) Regards, Gilles

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+1 On Saturday, 2 July 2016 1:27 AM, Artem Barger wrote: +1 [contributor] Best regards,                       Artem Barger. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > +1 [contributor, not committer] > > > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM,

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+1 [contributor] Best regards, Artem Barger. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > +1 [contributor, not committer] > > > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+1 [contributor, not committer] > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 + (UTC), venkatesha m wrote: >> Does this use Java 8? > > What is "this"? > > If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new > thread.

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 + (UTC), venkatesha m wrote: Does this use Java 8? What is "this"? If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new thread. Thank you, Gilles On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Does this use Java 8? On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: One could argue that

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory >>> wrote: >>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could > include a random package. For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could include a random package. Gary On Jun 25, 2016 9:06 AM, "Gilles" wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:01:14 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > >> +0 >> >> The big mix of stuff here makes it feel

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:01:14 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: +0 The big mix of stuff here makes it feel like Commons Math Lite, Hmm, no; it's certainly more akin to... Commons Lang, but more focused (on numerical utilities) and much leaner! Actually, the big code chunk is, by far,

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+0 The big mix of stuff here makes it feel like Commons Math Lite, so I would not decide on this before the Math TLP/Incubator route is settled (or abandoned). On 21 Jun 2016 8:30 p.m., "Gilles" wrote: > Hello. > > This is one of several votes for establishing new

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:45:33 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote: +/- 0 I'm unsure. We already have some Math code in Commons Lang. Maybe this code would fit into o.a.c.lang3.math ? In principle, yes, but I'd be wary of a big codebase that becomes less and less focused. I think that whatever is a

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

+/- 0 I'm unsure. We already have some Math code in Commons Lang. Maybe this code would fit into o.a.c.lang3.math ? OTOH it's a big codebase, it may make sense to make a separate component out of it. The scope is pretty math centric. So a Math TLP may be a better home for this. Benedikt Gilles

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Le 21/06/2016 à 21:30, Gilles a écrit : > This vote is dedicated to the following functionality: > Standard mathematical functions (either missing from "java.lang.Math", > or faster or more accurate than their counterpart in the JDK) and > floating point utilities. -0, I don't feel the

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > > This is one of several votes for establishing new Commons components > out of functionality developed inside the "Commons Math" component. > > This vote is dedicated to the following functionality: >

[VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Hello. This is one of several votes for establishing new Commons components out of functionality developed inside the "Commons Math" component. This vote is dedicated to the following functionality: Standard mathematical functions (either missing from "java.lang.Math", or faster or more