Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On Java 5/6, I'm in favour of Java 6 at this point. To justify it for
Sebb, someone needs to check to see if any collections in
[collections] could implement the new interfaces added in Java 6 -
NavigableSet, NavigableMap and so on.
I am definitely +1 here. Java 6
FWIW, +1 as well!!! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On Java 5/6, I'm in
+1 to java 6 and using the new interfaces, removing classes that can
be replaced with Java 6 code.
Gary
On Jul 4, 2012, at 4:32, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW, +1 as well!!! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
To clarify what I've said before, there are two user requirements here;
- adding generics to the last release while maintaining compatibility
- rethinking some APIs to get the best design features for Java 5+
(non-compatible)
ATM, no one is working on the first that I can see, yet that is what
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
To clarify what I've said before, there are two user requirements here;
- adding generics to the last release while maintaining compatibility
- rethinking some APIs to get the best design features for Java 5+
(non-compatible)
ATM, no one is working on
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few
questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level
to Java 1.6 would allow
On 07/03/2012 11:04 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few
questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the
On 3 July 2012 22:43, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2012 11:04 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a
Early adopters who can provide valuable feedback might run into the
troubles we try to address by the package and group/artifact I'd changes.
Other than that, I would agree that there doesn't seem to be any reason to
change it now.
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Jul
Hi,
thanks for all the feedback. I will then postpone all Java 6 related
changes but start with the other ones.
I hope my activity will spark some more interest by other people as it
would be a pity to never release a generic version of collections if it is
there and ready to be used.
Thomas
Hi,
even if my English is not as good as I'd like, I'd be happy to work with
you on it.
Furthermore, I +1 all your proposition (even if Java 6 dependency may be
discussed).
2012/6/25 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
Hi,
thanks for all the feedback. I will then postpone all Java 6
On Java 5/6, I'm in favour of Java 6 at this point. To justify it for
Sebb, someone needs to check to see if any collections in
[collections] could implement the new interfaces added in Java 6 -
NavigableSet, NavigableMap and so on.
Stephen
On 24 June 2012 12:25, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
If none of the existing collections could use it, write a new one! Java 6
FTW!
On Jun 25, 2012 9:10 AM, Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@joda.org wrote:
On Java 5/6, I'm in favour of Java 6 at this point. To justify it for
Sebb, someone needs to check to see if any collections in
[collections]
Hi Thomas,
A bit late with my reply, sorry -- but if you could do with an extra pair
of hands on this I'd be happy to help!
Regards,
Liv
Liviu Tudor
E: liviu.tu...@gmail.com
C: +1 650-2833815 (USA)
M: +44 (0)7591540313 (UK, Europe)
W: http://about.me/liviutudor
Skype: liviutudor
I'm
On 06/25/2012 08:41 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
Hi Thomas,
A bit late with my reply, sorry -- but if you could do with an extra pair
of hands on this I'd be happy to help!
Hi,
apart from the normal cleanup, adding unit tests and javadoc, I would
like to see the following features added:
- add
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level
to Java 1.6 would allow the use of @Override in more places (instead
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code
I am +1 to all your proposed changes.
Gary
On Jun 24, 2012, at 5:29, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still
Are we going through that Java 5 vs Java 6 discussion again? ;)
Thomas: I always wanted to work on collections but there hasn't been much
activity since I joined the ML. I'd be happy to contribute some patches.
Benedikt
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 24.06.2012 um 14:10 schrieb Gary Gregory
On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still lots of
On 24 June 2012 13:42, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a
21 matches
Mail list logo
