Apparently you guys forgot about joinWith:
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/apidocs/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringUtils.html#joinWith-java.lang.String-java.lang.Object...-
However, even without this method, StringUtils.join can easily be
replaced with streams:
Stream.of(x,
Gary,
That's a good point. I wasn't thinking about StringUtil's applicability to
Object array.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:18 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:24 AM Tomo Suzuki
> wrote:
>
> > (I'm not a commons-lang user)
> > Java 8 has String.join for the same purpose.
> >
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:24 AM Tomo Suzuki
wrote:
> (I'm not a commons-lang user)
> Java 8 has String.join for the same purpose.
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/String.html#join-java.lang.CharSequence-java.lang.CharSequence...-
> I would deprecate StringUtils.join in
(I'm not a commons-lang user)
Java 8 has String.join for the same purpose.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/String.html#join-java.lang.CharSequence-java.lang.CharSequence...-
I would deprecate StringUtils.join in favor of String.join.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:16 AM Matt
Definitely +1 if we didn't already do this, except I would put what I call
a "Yoda preposition" in there, e.g. joinBy or joinWith.
Matt
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, 9:00 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> HI All:
>
> Now that Java's had varargs for a while now, using APIs like
>
HI All:
Now that Java's had varargs for a while now, using APIs like
org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils.join(Object[], char) feels backward to
me. I want to say:
StringUtils.join('.', "foo", "bar", "bang");
Not:
StringUtils.join(new String[] { "foo", "bar", "bang" }, '.');
Any thoughts on
