Hi all
in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different
opinions on the importance of the site build for release candidates.
On 2013-10-13, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
I have not created a RC website as
Le 13/10/2013 17:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all
in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different
opinions on the importance of the site build for release candidates.
On 2013-10-13, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.frwrote:
Le 13/10/2013 17:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all
in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different
opinions on the importance of the site build for release candidates.
On 2013-10-13,
On 10/13/13 11:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.frwrote:
Le 13/10/2013 17:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all
in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different
opinions on the importance of the site build for
Am 13.10.2013 20:51, schrieb Henri Yandell:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.frwrote:
Le 13/10/2013 17:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all
in the recent release vote for Compress Gary and I had very different
opinions on the importance of the site build
The problem I'm seeing with deploying the side as needed is, that the
JavaDoc report will the so latest trunk and not the latest released API. In
[LANG] we have the link to the latest realese JavaDoc. Compress for example
has no such link. So a redeploy (for example to add some more
documentation)
On 13 October 2013 20:26, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
The problem I'm seeing with deploying the side as needed is, that the
JavaDoc report will the so latest trunk and not the latest released API. In
[LANG] we have the link to the latest realese JavaDoc. Compress for example
has