Re: [RDF] Implementation class name style?

Hi, For names, I like CamelCaseEvenForAcronyms, like IbmXmlSaxParser instead of IBMXMLSAXParser. Gary On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > [[ I've copied both lists, prefer replies to d...@commons.apache.org ]] > > What style should we use for

Re: [RDF] adaptation methods in RDFTermFactory?

Couldn't you do the JDBC Wrapper style interface and have a generic method like: T unwrap(Class cls); Or make more specific unwrap methods like: T unwrap(Class cls); If this is for implementation-specific casts and such. On 12 September 2016 at 19:56, Stian Soiland-Reyes

[RDF] adaptation methods in RDFTermFactory?

[[ Cross-post - prefer replies to dev@commons ]] Each of the Common RDF implementations come with a RDFTermFatory http://stain.github.io/incubator-commonsrdf/integration/org/apache/commons/rdf/api/RDFTermFactory.html On a classical flat classloader the implementations of this factory can be

[RDF] jena, rdf4j, json-ld integrations

Hi, [[ Cross-posting - let's try to reply to dev@commons. ]] As you might have spotted if you've seen the Commons RDF Jira/commit emails, I have been working on adding integrations for Jena, RDF4j and JSONLD-Java on these branches: https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/tree/jena

[jira] [Resolved] (COMMONSRDF-34) Add DatasetImpl using Jena

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stian Soiland-Reyes resolved COMMONSRDF-34. --- Resolution: Fixed > Add DatasetImpl using Jena >

[jira] [Work stopped] (COMMONSRDF-33) Jena integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on COMMONSRDF-33 stopped by Stian Soiland-Reyes. - > Jena integration > > >