Re: Moving Apache Extras

At Apache Camel we use camel-extras to host Camel components/modules that depend on 3rd party dependencies that are incompatible with ASLv2. After briefly discussing with some committers / contributors on our mailing lists, I get the impression that most folks would prefer to migrate camel-extras

RE: Moving Apache Extras

Hi, I come in a bit late on the discussion (I hope I won't break the mail threading, I don't have a message to answer to…). We were discussing the subject on camel-users and I was wondering if you were aware of the very problematic behaviour of SourceForge? I am referring to the following

Re: Current status of the apache extra move to SF ?

On Friday, September 4, 2015, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hi Pontus, > I am not aware that comdev has reached a decision on this matter yet. > Perhaps it is time to do so, I think the discussion died out without any > formal verdict. that is also my impression. rgds jan i > >

Re: Current status of the apache extra move to SF ?

Hi Pontus, I am not aware that comdev has reached a decision on this matter yet. Perhaps it is time to do so, I think the discussion died out without any formal verdict. WIth regards, Daniel. On 2015-09-04 17:05, Pontus Ullgren wrote: Hi, Just wanted to check if there is any current status

Re: Moving Apache Extras

Yes, ASF "central" has no strong opinion on the matter and delegates this totally to the PMCs. It is useful that this kind of feedback reaches ComDev, so projects learn from each other and can make informed decisions. Cheers Niclas On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Raul Kripalani

Current status of the apache extra move to SF ?

Hi, Just wanted to check if there is any current status of the project to move the apache extra projects to SF ? There is pressure for the camel-extra users to get a 2.15.x release out to match the latest release from the Apache Camel project also at present we have no where to record bugs or