Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Melissa Warnkin
Speaker notifications haven't gone out yet - so I was just informed from Angela. Supposedly, they're going out tomorrow. From: William A Rowe Jr To: ComDev Cc: hadr...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 7:30 PM Subject: Re:

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Karanjeet Singh wrote: > Hi Hadrian, > > Just a corner case - did you check your spam folder? > Thank you for pointing out the obvious, I haven't been there in months, but it seems that gmail is especially aggressive about treating our speaker

Re: Help with task: Make our event calendar less US centric

2016-09-28 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/27/2016 10:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > I've made a first pass of improving the various event pages, with what I > think each URL is/should be used for. > > https://www.apache.org/events/ > Permanent landing URL for jumping off to any event related content. > >

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/28/2016 03:57 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > Hi there, > How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it > as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply" You email the address mentioned in the acceptance/rejection email itself. Please don't expect the CFP page to

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
I think you can reply to the email that is at the message bottom On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > Hi there, > How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it > as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply" > > > On Wed, Sep

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi there, How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply" On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I did get the notification, thank you very much. Unfortunately it looks

Re: Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Big +1 here. Projects that can't be repeatably built risk decay faster than those that can. Given the needs of some build chains (especially Windows, in my experience) I also endorse the fact that this does not specifically call out /automated/ builds, though projects should be striving to

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Hi Rich, I did get the notification, thank you very much. Unfortunately it looks like I've been waitlisted which means that very likely I won't see you guys in Spain. And yes, I actually consider this quite an achievement myself, kudos to you all. It was not a complaint from me, I had to

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/28/2016 08:44 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Hi Karan, Humbedooh, > > I didn't find anything in the spam folder. It would be good if the > status would be adjusted from 'new' to the appropriate one in the CFP > dashboard. If one knows the status and could inform me privately that'd > be

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Hi Karan, Humbedooh, I didn't find anything in the spam folder. It would be good if the status would be adjusted from 'new' to the appropriate one in the CFP dashboard. If one knows the status and could inform me privately that'd be appreciated too. Daniel, it says 09/30 for publishing the

Re: Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
That is an interesting one. And funny enough, there are two parts of that IMHO. 1. Check out from source control repository, and re-produce a source release build, resulting in a releasable artifact. 2. That the built artifact can be downloaded, and built for a given platform/deployment. In my

Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-28 Thread Mark Thomas
All, After a discussion on the general@incubator.a.o mailing list [1], I'd like to propose the following addition to the project maturity model. RE50 The release process is documented and repeatable to the extent that someone new to the project is able to independently generate a release build.

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-28 Thread Daniel Gruno
Welp, it says September 30th on the main page (which AIUI is what we're going for) - there seems to be some mixup here. With regards, Daniel. On 09/28/2016 06:03 AM, Karanjeet Singh wrote: > Hi Hadrian, > > Just a corner case - did you check your spam folder? > > Sincerely, > Karan > > On Sep