Re: [PR] Prototype "volunteers" page (comdev-site)

2024-02-23 Thread Rich Bowen
I've not had a chance to review carefully because I'm traveling but I love the idea and am +1 to the patch in concept. Since it is replacing something that doesn't work, I see no risk in moving forward with this. Thanks! Rich On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 03:44 bdelacretaz (via GitHub) wrote: > >

Re: [PR] Prototype "volunteers" page (comdev-site)

2024-02-23 Thread via GitHub
sebbASF commented on PR #146: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961091696 It's better, but there are still some changes that appear to be unrelated -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [PR] Prototype "volunteers" page (comdev-site)

2024-02-23 Thread via GitHub
bdelacretaz commented on PR #146: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961058802 > it appears to have a lot of unrelated changes.. yes, sorry I messed up after rebasing, fixed now -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Prototype "volunteers" page (comdev-site)

2024-02-23 Thread via GitHub
sebbASF commented on PR #146: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961033402 It's very difficult to review the PR, as it appears to have a lot of unrelated changes. It would be better to make separate changes in separate commits, otherwise the history is

Re: [PR] Prototype "volunteers" page (comdev-site)

2024-02-23 Thread via GitHub
bdelacretaz commented on PR #146: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961010970 I'm planning to merge this early next week unless someone objects. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub