On 7 Jan 2015, at 08:55, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Mike Drob md...@mdrob.com wrote:
...I understand the value of measuring maturity after a project has left the
Incubator, but I also don't know that we want to put an additional set of
checkboxes on projects.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
...I would add something about the build of the sources. Because having
sources without having a repeatable build or having no clue about how to
build it, it makes the sources quite useless
That might
On 06/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
With regard to competitors, I just remind myself that forking is a
feature and that community before code means not acting like a
competitor. One should not accept the so-called competitor's terms
of debate, no matter how much individuals might see and
Sent from a miserable mobile device
On 07/gen/2015, at 09:26, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
With regard to competitors, I just remind myself that forking is a
feature and that community before code means not acting like a
competitor.
Well, now that you say so, there is that guy called Rich Bowen. You
know, most developers ain't that rich and this guy ostensibly says he's
Rich... This may hurt financial feelings.
Another option is to call the guy Poor Bowen, so everyone feels ok?
Just a suggestion.
On 2015-01-06 22:48,
thanks daniel...
here at bigtop we are 100% git based. so having an svn account , just to
push changes to a site, seems to slow us down alot.
is SVN required ? or is there another way?
right now we have a system that uses maven, followed by svn and then we
have to approve the changes in the
Hi apache !
Whats the simplest way to maintain the xyz.apache.org site? Right now we
push to SVN, but would be great to use something like the github.io model,
where the static pages are just hosted directly.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:56 PM, dev-h...@community.apache.org wrote:
Hi! This is
Essentially, github uses the same method as we do with svnpubsub.
Files are pushed to a repository and then from there pushed directly to
the web site.
Is there anything specific about the github model that you think differ
from how we do things?
Apart from it being git and not subversion,
As for timing, it's now. But if you only have time to show up at the BOF and
share your experience that will be appreciated.
Ahh - My takeaway from the email was that the ask was for organizing a BoF.
What is it that you need help with?
--David
I might be interested in volunteering (though, I won't be in Austin).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I know we have a bunch of people who already volunteer to teach in
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Cool, thanks Chris. Keep an eye on this list. I'll keep you informed here
(and may ping you privately if there is something specific I think you can
help with).
In the meantime, do you have any
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:04:32AM +, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 7 Jan 2015, at 08:55, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Mike Drob md...@mdrob.com wrote:
...I understand the value of measuring maturity after a project has left
the
Incubator, but I also don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
